Skip to main content
. 2020 May 12;11:890. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00890

TABLE 3.

Spy- and Snoop-coupling efficiencies to HbpD displayed on OMVs.

Displayed HbpD variant Ligation product
SnC-(to d1) SpC-(to d2/d4) SnC-… + SpC-
HbpD-(d1)SnT-(d2)SpT (112) TrxA (139) 88%# MBP (168) 96% TrxA + MBP (193) 71%
HbpD-(d1)SnT-(d2)SpT (ND) TrxA (137) 100% (ND)
HbpD-(d1)SnT-(d4)SpT (120) TrxA (147) 92% MBP (173) 98% TrxA + MBP (201) 84%
HbpD-(d1)SnT-(d4)SpT (ND) TrxA (145) 100% (ND)
SnT-(to d1) SpC-(to d2/4) SnT-… + SpC-
HbpD-(d1)SnC-(d2)SpT (123) TrxA (139) 69% MBP (176) 99% TrxA + MBP (192) 43%
HbpD-(d1)SnC-(d2)SpT MBP (168) 26% TrxA (148) 99% MBP + TrxA (193) 24%
HbpD-(d1)SnC-(d4)SpT (131) TrxA (147) 55% MBP (184) 99% TrxA + MBP (200) 28%&
HbpD-(d1)SnC-(d4)SpT MBP (176) 25% TrxA (156) 93% MBP + TrxA (201) 26%

Protein molecular mass in kDa is given between brackets. #Percentage of Hbp ligated with SnC-, SpC-, and/or SnT-fusion protein(s). SnC-MBP was rather prone to aggregation and not further analyzed in coupling experiments. &Estimate because the single and double adducts have similar mobility in SDS-PAGE.