Table 2.
The 0.05 and 0.95 quantiles for each GWBC among each population tested
| Dataset | n1 | Duroc2 | Hampshire3 | Landrace4 | Yorkshire5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YorkshirePure | 930 | (0.000, 0.055) | (0.000, 0.054) | (0.000, 0.113) | (0.825, 1.000) |
| Showpigs | 26 | (0.000, 0.033) | (0.002, 0.387) | (0.000, 0.037) | (0.572, 0.998) |
| MARCduroc | 88 | (0.907, 1.000) | (0.000, 0.035) | (0.000, 0.039) | (0.000, 0.041) |
| MARChampshire | 17 | (0.000, 0.013) | (0.946, 1.000) | (0.000, 0.054) | (0.000, 0.014) |
| MARClandrace | 65 | (0.000, 0.062) | (0.000, 0.066) | (0.811, 1.000) | (0.000, 0.161) |
| MARCyorkshire | 113 | (0.000, 0.076) | (0.000, 0.044) | (0.000, 0.111) | (0.816, 1.000) |
1
Sample size.
2–5
Quantiles for β1, β2, β3, and β4 from GWBC regression, represented as (0.05 quantile, 0.95 quantile).