Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 25;23(5):101099. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101099

Table 1.

Device Configurations Used in the Different Laboratories

Name Junctions Descriptiona Contact Areac [μm2]
Geometric Uncertainty Methodb
LOFO-Au Si/SiOx-linker-protein//LOFO-Au 2 × 105 ±10% Img
Hg Si/SiOx-linker-protein//Hg 5000 ±5% Img
evap-Pb Si/SiOx-linker-protein//evap-Pb/Au 5000 ±10% Ptr
th-EGaIn TSAu-linker-protein//GaOx/th-EGaIn 1000 ±10% Ptr
μch-EGaIn TSAu-linker-protein//GaOx/μch-EGaIn 500 ±10% Ptr
tip-EGaIn TSAu-linker-protein//GaOx/tip-EGaIn 300 ±10% Img
Au nanorod Au-linker-protein//Au nanorod ~5 × 10−3 ±50% AFM Img
NAB Carbon-NAB//evap-C//Au 1.25× 105 ±10% Ptr

Protein: ferritin, PSI; bR.

Img or Ptr mark whether the geometric area was obtained from a microscopy image (Img) or AFM tapping mode imaging (AFM Img) or dictated by feature patterning (Ptr).

a

Refer to Figure 1.

b

mg or Ptr mark whether the geometric area was obtained from a microscopy image (Img) or AFM tapping mode imaging (AFM Img) or dictated by feature patterning (Ptr).

c

Refer to Figure 2.