Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 25;23(5):101099. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101099

Table 3.

Summary of Extracted Parameters for Different Junction Configurations (Rows) with Three Different Proteins (Columns)

Junction Geq[mAV1cm2] Γeff[μeV]a ε0[eV]
Name Bottom Top bR PSI Ferritin bR PSI Ferritin bR PSI Ferritin
n-rod Au Au 5,500 7,500 5.2 × 105 130 75 850 0.53 0.20 0.42
LOFO p++−Si Au 0.1 0.65 0.83 0.076 0.49 0.34 0.07 0.14 0.14
Hg p++−Si Hg 0.03 0.03 0.27 0.036 0.073 0.31 0.07 0.10 0.21
μch TSAu EGaIn 0.45 0.15 0.97 0.75 0.45 0.96 0.35 0.27 0.35
Th TSAu EGaIn 1.3 0.02 0.001 1.3 0.14 0.023 0.34 0.24 0.24
tipb TSAu EGaIn 0.0005 0.002 0.001 0.024 0.04 0.018 0.34 0.20 0.19
0.003 0.049 0.34
a

Γeff was computed using Eq. 3b from Geq and ε0=qV0/2 and number of molecules, N=1E14[nm/cm]2footprint[nm2],with protein's footprint of 80, 140, and 60 nm2 for bR, PS-I, and ferritin, respectively. These values are based on protein's diameter and include a factor of 2 for circular surface filling; the bR is further multiplied by 2 to account for surrounding OTG matrix.

b

tip-EGaIn shows two values for Ferritin: the upper one was measured by UoG (as were the other two proteins) and the lower one by WIS.