Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 10;9(4):76. doi: 10.3390/biology9040076

Table A5.

Comparison of identification species between our study and the study of Tran et al. (2018) [25].

No Species Identified Species Uisng ITS
Our Study Tran et al. (2018)
1 D. aloifolium + not included
2 D. amabile +
3 D. anosmum
(synonym name D. superbum)
+
4 D. aphyllum + +
5 D. capillipes + +
6 D. chrysotoxum + +
7 D. cretaceum + not included
8 D. crumenatum + not included
9 D. crystallinum + not included
10 D. densiflorum + not included
D.devonianum not included
11 D. farmeri +
12 D. fimbriatum + +
13 D. hercoglossum
(synonym name D. linguella)
not included
14 D. intricatum + not included
15 D. nobile +
16 D. parishii + +
17 D. primulinum + +
18 D. pulchellum + not included
19 D. hancockii
(previously named D. salaccense)
+ +
20 D. secundum + not included
21 D. signatum not included
22 D. sulcatum + not included
23 D. tortile
24 D. venustum + not included
25 D. anosmum × D. parishi not included
26 D. anosmum × D. aphyllum not included
27 D. Gatton Sunray not included
28 D. findlayanum not included +
29 D. moschatum not included +
30 D. chrysanthum not included +
31 D. thyrsiflorum not included +
32 D. wattii not included +
33 D. jenkinsii not included +
34 D. haveyanum not included
35 D. aduncum not included +
36 D.brymerianum not included +
37 D. draconis not included +
38 D. christyanum not included +
28 species 23 species
19 identified species 19 identified species