Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 15.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Inj Law. 2020 Apr 15;2020:10.1007/s12207-020-09373-y. doi: 10.1007/s12207-020-09373-y

Table 3.

Effect of Differing Cut Scores on Identification of Symptom Overreporting

Overall
PTSD+
PTSD−
Cut Scores % n % n % n χ2
M-FAST
6 17.22 36 26.45 32 4.55 4 17.14***
8 11.48 24 19.01 23 1.14 1 16.01***
16 0.48 1 0.83 1 0.00 0  0.73
SIMS
13 70.18 120 86.54 90 44.78 30 33.96***
14 66.67 114 82.69 86 41.79 28 30.68***
16 59.65 102 74.04 77 37.31 25 22.83***
44 2.34 4 3.85 4 0.00 0  2.64

Note. N = 209 for analyses of the M-FAST; n = 171 for analyses of the SIMS. The M-FAST cut-score of 6 is recommended in the manual while scores of 8 and 16 have been described in the literature (see introduction). The SIMS cut-score of 14 is recommended in the measure’s manual, and differential sensitivity and specificity at cut-scores of 13 and 16 are also described in the manual; a cut-score of 44 has been evaluated in prior published research (see introduction). M-FAST = Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (Miller, 2001); SIMS = Structured Interview of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS; Widows & Smith, 2005; Smith & Burger, 1997).

***

p < .001