Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 18.
Published in final edited form as: Anal Chem. 2020 Feb 7;92(4):3285–3292. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05173

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Comparison of diameters derived from CDMS measurements and EM images. (top) Plot showing the frequency distribution of electron micrograph-derived diameters (shown in Figure 2) using a bin size of 2.5 nm. (bottom) Plot of CDMS-derived diameters for each of the subpopulation (shown in Figure 3) using a bin size of 0.5 nm. Particle diameters from CDMS were determined by assuming a spherical geometry and a density of 1.15 g·cm−3.