Skip to main content
. 2020 May 19;20:715. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08864-6

Table 3.

Fixed and random effects and variance components for happy (model 1a & 2a), calm (model 1b & 2b), stressed (model 1c & 2c), angry (model 1d & 2d), and sad/depressed (model 1e & 2e)

Outcome Fixed Random
Predictor Coefficient SE t-Value df p-Value Coefficient SD Wald Z p-value 95%-Predictive Interval a
Feeling Happy
 Model 1a (participants: N = 183; prompts: n = 3270)
  Intercept 2.578 0.076 33.873 2428 < .001 0.168 0.020 8.045 < .001 0.13 0.21
  SWLS 0.157 0.024 6.408 173 < .001
  Work Status 0.057 0.033 1.710 3301 .087
  PA (120 min) 8.9E-7 6.7E-7 1.331 3224 .183
  Together with child 0.082 0.031 2.653 3356 .008
 Model 2a (participants: N = 103; prompts: n = 249)
  Intercept 2.829 0.195 14.472 264 < .001 0.215 0.050 4.251 < .001 0.14 0.34
  SWLS 0.115 0.045 2.427 113 .013
  Work Status −0.069 0.099 −0.697 240 .486
  PA (120 min) 2.17E-6 1,69E-6 1.283 245 .201
  Sport to-gether with child 0.377 0.086 4.353 273 < .001
Feeling Calm
 Model 1b (paricipants: N = 182; prompts: n = 3296)
  Intercept 2.34 0.086 27.051 2812 < .001 0.161 0.021 7.719 < .001 0.13 0.21
  SWLS 0.163 0.024 6.635 175 < .001
  Work Status 0.071 0.038 1.834 3307 .067
  PA (120 min) −3.0E-6 7.83E-7 −3.838 3228 < .001
  Together with child 0.085 0.035 2.551 3380 .018
 Model 2b (participants: N = 103; prompts: n = 249)
  Intercept 2.137 0.216 9.888 262 < .001 0.289 0.067 4.280 < .001 0.18 0.45
  SWLS 0.180 0.051 3.465 108 < .001
  Work Status 0.113 0.110 1.030 234 .304
  PA (120 min) −1.8E-7 1,8E-6 −0.098 239 .922
  Sport to-gether with child 0.388 0.096 4.039 271 < .001
Feeling stressed
 Model 1c (participants: N = 183; prompts: n = 3268)
  Intercept 1.810 0.072 25.127 2848 < .001 0.106 0.014 7.525 < .001 0.08 0.13
  SWLS −0.085 0.020 −4.051 170 < .001
  Work Status −0.087 0.032 −2.666 3304 .008
  PA (120 min) 6.8E-7 6.5E-7 1.046 3223 .296
  Together with child −0.106 0.030 −3.552 3382 < .001 0.023 0.011 2.081 .037 0.01 0.06
 Model 2c (participants: N = 103; prompts: n = 249)
  Intercept 1.915 0.175 10.890 268 < .001 0.107 0.034 3.101 .002 0.06 0.20
  SWLS −0.07 0.036 −1.885 99 .062
  Work Status −0.152 0.090 −1.673 250 .095
  PA (120 min) 1.6E-6 1.6E-6 −0.168 315 .313
  Sport to-gether with child −0.311 0.077 −4.037 277 < .001
Feeling Angry
 Model 1d (participants: N = 183; prompts: n = 3267)
  Intercept 1.430 0.070 20.332 3323 < .001 0.051 0.008 6.353 < .001 0.03 0.07
  SWLS −0.066 0.015 −4.362 161 < .001
  Work Status −0.032 0.032 −1.015 3228 .310
  PA (120 min) 1.1E-6 6.3E-7 1.680 3139 .093
  Together with child −0.001 0.028 −0.041 3322 .968
Model 2d (participants: N = 103; prompts: n = 249)
  Intercept 1.625 0.206 7.864 270 < .001 0.048 0.025 1.918 .05 .02 .13
  SWLS −0.094 0.032 −2.937 94 .004
  Work Status −0.090 0.016 −0.852 .268 395
  PA (120 min) −8.4E-7 1.6E-6 −0.520 264 .604
  Sport to-gether with child −0.201 0.075 −2.668 265 .008
Feeling sad/depressed
 Model 1e (participants: N = 183; prompts: n = 3270)
  Intercept 1.224 0.045 26.678 2505 < .001 0.056 0.007 8.023 < .001 .04 .07
  SWLS −0.076 0.014 −5.352 173 < .001
  Work Status −0.017 0.020 −0.870 3222 .385
  PA (120 min) 1,5 E-7 3.9 E-7 0.402 3143 .402
  Together with child −0.021 0.018 −1.152 3274 .249
Model 2e (participants: N = 103; prompts: n = 249)
  Intercept 1.299 0.126 10.275 265 < .001 0.050 0.012 4.054 < .001 .03 .08
  SWLS −0.127 0.023 −5.408 123 < .001
  Work Status −0.054 0.065 −0.828 259 .409
  PA (120 min) 3.6 E-7 9.9 E-7 0.369 248 .712
  Sport to-gether with child −0.116 0.047 −2.460 268 .015

aBased on the assumption of normally distributed regression coefficients, the 95% predictive interval indicates the range of values between which 95% of the regression coefficients are estimated to lie (Hox, 2010). The intervals were calculated based on a model without Level 2 predictors