Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 2.
Published in final edited form as: Cell. 2020 Apr 2;181(1):136–150. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.023

Table 2.

Gene sizes of selected CRISPR-based tools in comparison with AAV vector genome size.

Tool Function Gene size (kb) Ref.

Within AAV packaging limit SpCas9 Nuclease 4.2 Cong et al., 2013
SaCas9 Nuclease 3.2 Ran et al., 2015
PspCas13b Ribonuclease 3.4 Cox et al., 2017
RfxCas13d Ribonuclease 2.9 Konermann et al., 2018
dPspCas13b(tr)-ADARdd RNA editing 4.1 Cox et al., 2017
dSaCas9-KRAB CRISPRi 3.6 Thakore et al., 2018
FnCas12a Nuclease 3.9 Zetsche et al., 2015a
BhCas12b Nuclease 3.3 Strecker et al., 2019
Beyond AAV packaging limit BE4 Cytosine base editing 5.6 Komor et al., 2017
ABE7.10 Adenine base editing 5.3 Gaudelli et al., 2017
dSpCas9-TET1 Editing DNA methylation 6.4 Liu et al., 2016
PE2 Prime editing 6.4 Anzalone et al., 2019

AAV vector component Function Size (kb)

ITR × 2 Vector genome rescue and replication during packaging; Packaging signal 0.3 total
Transgene cassette Transgene expression < 4.7