Skip to main content
. 2020 May 20;44:e33. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2020.33

TABLE 4. Course evaluation (N = 11 525).

Evaluation Items

Strongly Agree 5

Agree 4

Neutral 3

Disagree 2

Strongly Disagree 1

No Answer N/A

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

My overall evaluation of the course is positive

9 158

(79.5)

2 239

(19.4)

89

(0.8)

5

(0.04)

26

(0.2)

8

(0.06)

I would recommend this course to a colleague

9 279

(80.5)

2 117

(18.3)

90

(0.8)

10

(0.1)

18

(0.2)

11

(0.1)

The course material is presented effectively

7 894

(68.5)

3 199

(27.8)

358

(3.1)

28

(0.2)

35

(0.3)

11

(0.1)

The case studies and thinking questions stimulate interest in the material

8 104

(70.3)

3 156

(27.4)

225

(2)

14

(0.1)

16

(0.1)

9

(0.1)

The material in the modules reflects the learning objectives of the course

7 996

(69.4)

3 291

(28.6)

204

(1.8)

17

(0.14)

9

(0.1)

8

(0.06)

This course has challenged me to think

7 802

(67.7)

3 266

(28.3)

373

(3.2)

46

(0.4)

15

(0.1)

23

(0.2)

The quizzes accurately assessed what I have learned in this course

7 836

(68)

3 389

(29.4)

245

(2.2)

24

(0.2)

13

(0.1)

10

(0.1)

The difficulty of the course was appropriate

7 108

(61.7)

3 866

(33.5)

463

(4)

55

(0.5)

18

(0.2)

16

(0.1)

The course material was relevant to my nursing practice

8 794

(76.3)

2 389

(20.7)

210

(1.8)

61

(0.5)

52

(0.4)

39

(0.3)

The material was culturally appropriate to me

8 246

(71.5)

3 015

(26.2)

225

(1.9)

18

(0.2)

12

(0.1)

9

(0.1)

I learned something new

9 039

(78.4)

2 310

(20)

149

(1.3)

8

(0.06)

11

(0.1)

8

(0.06)

I am confident that I can apply what I have learned to my nursing practice

9 233

(80.1)

2 132

(18.5)

120

(1.1)

11

(0.1)

9

(0.1)

7

(0.1)

Source: prepared by authors from the study results.