Table 6. Classification results of PPI predictions on the STRING database.
Combined-score dataset | Experimental-700 dataset | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Precision | Recall | F1 | AUC | Precision | Recall | F1 | AUC | |
Direct comparison | ||||||||
BioAvgWord (cbow) | 0.8195 | 0.7935 | 0.8063 | 0.8941 | 0.8851 | 0.7422 | 0.8074 | 0.9123 |
Yu et al. (cbow) | 0.8236 | 0.8017 | 0.8125 | 0.9029 | 0.9130 | 0.7686 | 0.8346 | 0.9283 |
BioConceptVec (cbow) | 0.8304 | 0.8025 | 0.8162 | 0.9064 | 0.9476 | 0.7981 | 0.8664 | 0.9525 |
Different embedding methods | ||||||||
BioConcept (skip-gram) | 0.8279 | 0.8097 | 0.8187 | 0.9074 | 0.9201 | 0.8525 | 0.8850 | 0.9522 |
BioConcept (GloVe) | 0.8116 | 0.8102 | 0.8109 | 0.9004 | 0.8656 | 0.8289 | 0.8468 | 0.9218 |
BioConcept (fastText) | 0.8324 | 0.8100 | 0.8210 | 0.9099 | 0.9076 | 0.8677 | 0.8872 | 0.9556 |