Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 20;14(4):e0007143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007143

Table 1. Sequencing data and summary statistics of read mapping and variant calls.

The third column indicates the classification status of the isolates suggested by Gelanew et al. 2014, rather than our conclusions based on the whole-genome data presented here. *DM19 is heterozygous at only a subset of microsatellite and MLST markers, and was described as most likely to be the result of an independent hybridization event.

isolate WHO name Previous classification (Gelanew et al, 2014) Sequence reads (total Mb) Median mapped coverage Proportion of genome with > = 30x coverage # of variable sites against LV9 Hetero-
zygosity
DM19 MHOM/ET/2007/DM19 Possible hybrid* 21383530
(2138.3)
53 0.97 80930 0.301
DM20 MHOM/ET/2007/DM20 parental type A 19098154
(1909.8)
49 0.96 74749 0.024
DM62 MHOM/ET/2007/DM62 hybrid 19577434
(1957.7)
45 0.94 89636 0.468
DM256 MHOM/ET/2008/DM256 parental type B 19854188
(1985.4)
51 0.96 63042 0.015
DM257 MHOM/ET/2008/DM257 parental type B 23066268
(2306.6)
59 0.97 63088 0.016
DM259 MHOM/ET/2008/DM259 parental type B 16023002
(1602.3)
42 0.91 63209 0.028
DM295 MHOM/ET/2008/DM295 hybrid 20010052
(2001.0)
51 0.96 87546 0.388
DM297 MHOM/ET/2008/DM297 parental type A 20651456
(2065.1)
52 0.96 76530 0.072
DM299 MHOM/ET/2008/DM299 hybrid 22442162
(2244.2)
53 0.97 88605 0.462
DM481 MHOM/ET/2009/DM481 parental type
B
20625354
(2062.5)
53 0.97 82728 0.267
DM559 MHOM/ET/2009/DM559 parental type B 18753496 (1875.3) 51 0.96 63469 0.030