Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 4;17(4):554–570. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2020.1717154

Table 3.

Comparisons between ds mRNAs identified by calculation and the genes corresponding to endo-siRNAs associated with Ago2 published from two different studies.

Study nb of genes identified in the studies nb of genes in our filtered list Sensitivity Specificity p-value
Ghildiyal et al. S2 620 274 0.44 0.78 7.6x10−12
Ghildiyal et al. WT head 646 331 0.51 0.79 8.4x10−12
Czech et al. S2 95 51 0.54 0.76 2.2x10−10
Czech et al. ovaries 53 34 0.64 0.76 9.1x10−10
Total 1252 585 0.47 0.81 1.8x10−11

The numbers of genes corresponding to sequenced endo-siRNAs isolated by pull-down by Czech et al. [23] and Ghildiyal et al. [22] were retrieved according to the procedure described in the ‘Materials and Methods’ section. Briefly, all the reads in Ghildiyal et al.’s libraries were considered, and 50 reads for each sequence (as a cut-off) were retained for gene identification from Czech et al.’s libraries. The predictions are the numbers of these genes that are present in our calculated list of 4318 genes retaining only those showing the potential to form duplex RNAs with a minimum of 5 different other RNAs. The table displays the sensitivity values, corresponding to the number of computationally predicted genes found in the pull-down assays, along with the specificity values, corresponding to the number of genes that were not predicted to form a dsRNA and were not found in the pull-down assays. The p-values represent the probability of obtaining these results by chance.