Skip to main content
. 2020 May 14;12(2):158–165. doi: 10.4055/cios19069

Table 6. Knee Anthropometry of Nonarthritic Female Knees of Different Races Available in Literature.

Study Study group Nature of knee Method of study fML fAP fAR tML tAP tAR
This study Indian Healthy MRI 64.75 ± 3.37 52.8 ± 3.13 1.23 ± 0.07 65.52 ± 3.21 43.29 ± 2.7 1.52 ± 0.07
Li et al.6) Caucasian Healthy MRI 65.4 ± 1.4 55.4 ± 2.8 1.18 ± 0.05 70.2 ± 2.7 45.2 ± 2.3 1.54 ± 0.07
Li et al.6) Chinese Healthy CT 64.4 ± 2.6 52.8 ± 2.6 1.22 ± 0.05 69.1 ± 2.8 44.2 ± 2.3 1.56 ± 0.07
Mcnamara et al.7) Hispanic Healthy MRI 66.3 ± 3.0 45.6 ± 3.2 1.46 ± 0.09 69.8 ± 3.1 47.1 ± 2.6
Yue et al.16) Caucasian Healthy MRI 76.4 ± 4.0 59.7 ± 2.6 1.28 ± 0.06 69.0 ± 4.2 39.3 ± 2.6 1.76 ± 0.08
Yue et al.16) Chinese Healthy CT 72.8 ± 2.6 58.8 ± 2.5 1.24 ± 0.04 66.2 ± 2.1 37.3 ± 2.8 1.78 ± 0.10
Chaichankul et a.l18) Thai Healthy MRI 59.91 ± 3.75 43.32 ± 3.69 1.39 ± 0.12 64.95 ± 3.45 43.23 ± 2.57 -
Shah et al.3) Indian Arthritic CT 76.3 ± 3.8 62.1 ± 4.9 1.23 ± 0.06 72.2 ± 3.6 52.2 ± 4.2 1.51 ± 0.08

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

fML: femoral mediolateral, fAP: femoral anteroposterior, fAR: femoral aspect ratio, tML: tibial mediolateral, tAP: tibial anteroposterior, tAR: tibial aspect ratio, MRI: magnetic resonance imaging, CT: computed tomography.