Table 3.
Comparison of METAL and MANTRA results 1
METAL | MANTRA | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNP | ORall (95% CI2) | p value | ORAA (95% CrI3) | ORCA (95% CrI) | ORHI (95% CrI) | Log10BF |
Immune-mediated disease | ||||||
PTPN22 / rs3811021 | 1.31 (1.10-1.56) | 0.003 | 1.28 (1.03-1.59) | 1.31 (1.09-1.57) | 1.29 (1.06-1.58) | 0.520 |
male | 1.50 (1.15-1.95) | 0.003 | 1.47 (1.04-2.09) | 1.50 (1.14-1.96) | 1.50 (1.07-2.09) | 1.245 |
female | 1.15 (0.90-1.47) | 0.260 | 1.15 (0.88-1.51) | 1.16 (0.90-1.49) | 1.16 (0.88-1.52) | −0.176 |
Autoimmune disease | ||||||
ARNT / rs11204735 | 1.29 (1.08-1.55) | 0.005 | 1.30 (1.05-1.62) | 1.29 (1.08-1.55) | 1.29 (1.06-1.57) | 1.064 |
male | 1.35 (0.99-1.85) | 0.062 | 1.38 (0.79-2.40) | 1.35 (0.97-1.87) | 1.12 (0.41-3.06) | 0.153 |
female | 1.30 (1.04-1.62) | 0.022 | 1.30 (1.00-1.70) | 1.29 (1.02-1.63) | 1.31 (0.99-1.72) | 0.490 |
ARNT / rs1889740 | 1.25 (1.06-1.47) | 0.009 | 1.23 (1.03-1.48) | 1.25 (1.05-1.48) | 1.25 (1.04-1.50) | 1.000 |
male | 1.38 (1.02-1.86) | 0.036 | 1.45 (0.95-2.21) | 1.35 (0.99-1.86) | 1.20 (0.44-3.22) | 0.488 |
female | 1.24 (1.01-1.52) | 0.038 | 1.22 (0.95-1.55) | 1.26 (1.01-1.57) | 1.27 (0.98-1.65) | 0.545 |
Allergic disease | ||||||
PTPN22 / rs3811021 | 1.23 (1.03-1.46) | 0.023 | 1.08 (0.73-1.59) | 1.28 (1.04-1.57) | 1.22 (0.90-1.64) | 0.815 |
male | 1.58 (1.20-2.08) | 0.001 | 1.55 (1.11-2.18) | 1.59 (1.20-2.09) | 1.58 (1.12-2.23) | 1.847 |
female | 0.99 (0.78-1.26) | 0.936 | 0.91 (0.61-1.35) | 1.02 (0.79-1.32) | 1.00 (0.74-1.36) | −0.338 |
Results are from 7-SNP analysis;
CI = Confidence Interval;
CrI = Credible Interval
SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism; L95 = Lower boundary of 95% confidence interval; U95 = Upper boundary of 95% confidence interval; ORall = odds ratio for all groups combined; ORAA = odds ratio for African American cohort, ORCA = odds ratio for Caucasian cohort; ORHI = odds ratio for Hispanic cohort; log10BF = log10 Bayes factor.
The bold entries show results that were significant after Holm-Bonferroni correction (METAL) or credible (Bayesian perspective) considering the upper limit of the log10BF (MANTRA).