Table 2.

Association between positive contact norms in class and adolescents’ engagement in ethnic victimization: do adolescents’ attitudes matter?

						95% CI OR
	b	SE	t	p	OR	LL	UP
Intercept	−2.64	0.21	−12.63	<0.001	0.08	0.05	0.11
Age	0.55	0.22	2.49	0.013	1.72	1.13	2.64
Gendera	1.30	0.21	6.33	<0.001	3.66	2.45	5.47
Immigrant adolescentsb	0.69	0.24	2.88	0.004	2.00	1.25	3.20
Mixed adolescentsb	0.32	0.28	1.14	0.257	1.38	0.80	2.38
Parental employment	0.05	0.19	0.22	0.828	1.05	0.72	1.52
Classroom ethnic composition	−1.09	0.59	−1.86	0.064	0.34	0.11	1.07
Attitudes toward immigrants (AI)	−0.37	0.14	−2.78	0.006	0.70	0.54	0.90
Feelings toward immigrants (FI)	−0.24	0.08	−3.29	<0.001	0.79	0.69	0.91
Positive contact norms in class (PCN)	−0.51	0.16	−3.33	0.001	0.61	0.46	0.82
AI × PCN	−0.17	0.15	−1.22	0.225	0.85	0.65	1.12

The level-2 variance component in the model was estimated initially; however, the Hessian matrix was not positive definite due to lack of variation between classrooms. Therefore, the level-2 variance component was set at zero and the model re-estimated

^aGender was coded as: “0” girls and “1” boys

^b“Swedish adolescents” was defined as reference category