Table 3.
CFIR domain and construct | Target gaps in FQHC staffs’ capacity to . . . | Leverage existing partnerships and other capacity-building strategies |
---|---|---|
Process | ||
Planning | Assess local factors that contribute to low screening rates | |
Engaging | Identify and prepare champions and implementation leaders | Align with other external change agents that build FQHC capacity |
Executing | Develop and execute implementation plans | |
Reflecting and evaluating | • Use existing sources of data • Collect qualitative and quantitative data • Use data to improve processes and outcomes |
|
Outer setting | ||
Patient needs and resources | • Assess patient level factors that contribute to low screening rates • Identify and partner with colonoscopy providers |
Refer to sources of tailored patient education materials (e.g., Make it Your Own [28]) |
External policy and incentives | Provide grant funding for CRC screening intervention selection in addition to implementation | |
Cosmopolitanism | Work within existing regional and state QI networks | |
Inner setting | ||
Networks and communication | • Leverage FQHC’s existing QI and communication infrastructure • Strengthen QI and communication infrastructure |
Establish minimum QI infrastructure as a criterion for FQHC to participate in training |
Implementation climate | Use data feedback and other strategies to sustain investment in CRC screening as a priority | Provide grant funding so that FQHCs will prioritize CRC screening |
Readiness for implementation | • Engage leadership support • Educate and motivate staff |
Provide grant funding to hire additional staff and purchase resources |
CRC colorectal cancer; FQHC Federally Qualified Health Center; QI quality improvement.