Skip to main content
. 2020 May 20;23(3):3028–3047. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-00772-4

Table 1.

Proposed management framework for ecotourism ventures in changing environments.

Source Authors

Ecotourism element Shock Effect Management interventions Livelihood outcomes

Beneficiaries

Marketing

Linkages

Reduced international ecotourist visitation Reduced income from ecotourism

Promoting domestic ecotourism visits

Promoting multiple sources of income

Promoting favorable relations with the major international tourist source nations

More income to venture

Increased community well-being

Reduced vulnerability to shock

Beneficiaries

Marketing

Linkages

International hunting bans Loss of major source of ecotourism income

Lobbying to have ban removed

Diversification to non-consumptive ecotourism activities

Promoting multiple sources of income

More income to venture

Increased community well-being

Improved supply of meat protein and food security

More sustainable use of natural resource base

Reduced vulnerability to shock

Beneficiaries

Marketing

Linkages

Exclusion of youth and women

Failure of youths and women to benefit from natural resources management

Migration of youth to urban settlements

Promoting the involvement of youth and women in natural resources management

Carrying targeted and effective environmental education programmes to raise awareness

Increased community well-being

Reduced vulnerability to shock

Beneficiaries

Wildlife resources

Human population increase

Competition for land for agricultural and wildlife uses

Reduced dividends per capita from trophy hunting

Promoting effective and strong community organization and cohesion

Promoting multiple sources of income

Diversification to non-consumptive ecotourism activities

Reduced vulnerability to shock

More sustainable use of natural resource base

Management system

Beneficiaries

Linkages

Donor fatigue

Decline in earnings

Removal of external capacity building support

Increased ineffectiveness of local participatory processes

Developing sustainable self-funding mechanisms

Limiting dependence on donors

Promoting multiple sources of income

Increased community well-being

Reduced vulnerability to shock

Beneficiaries

Management system

Marketing

Accessibility

Amenities

Poor macro-economic environment in the country

Reduced ecotourist visitation

Hyperinflation

Withdrawal of international airlines from the country

Failure to maintain roads and amenities

Uncompetitive and expensive ecotourism packages

Increased incidences of corruption

Social disruption

Improved marketing and offering a unique ecotourism experience

Implementing effective feedback systems among stakeholders to decrease uncertainties

Capacity building in managing ecotourism in periods of hyperinflation

Promoting sport hunting

Reduced vulnerability to shock

Beneficiaries

Wildlife resources

Marketing

Linkages

Accessibility

Amenities

Attraction

Climate change

Failure to achieve trophy hunting quota leading to lower revenues

Damage of roads, bridges and lodges due to floods

Biophysical environmental degradation due to drought

Promoting climate smart ecotourism

Applying and lobbying for funds to mitigate climate change effects from international conservation agencies

Reduced vulnerability to shock

Increased community well-being