Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 20;9(4):531. doi: 10.3390/plants9040531

Table 2.

Rootstocks performance.

Rootstock Number of Evaluated Trees Productivity
(Fruit Tree−1) a
Susceptibility (Index) b Performance Score c
VC804 30 206 a 0 206
Dusa 30 213 a 20 193
Degania 189 30 176 abc 10 166
VC159 30 222 a 57 165
VC320 30 199 ab 40 159
Waldin 30 175 abc 17 158
Degania 62 30 160 abc 13 147
VC840 30 200 ab 57 143
VC207 30 169 abc 27 142
VC802 30 171 abc 40 131
VC68 30 166 abc 43 123
VC96 12 140 abc 25 115
VC801 30 132 abc 33 99
VC140 30 167 abc 70 97
VC55 30 129 abc 33 96
VC27 18 118 abc 50 68
VC162 6 136 abc 83 53
Nachlat 3 30 89 c 53 36
VC28 30 96 bc 63 33
VC26 26 98 abc 92 6
VC66 30 87 c 87 0
VC152 30 82 c 97 −15
Latas 12 0 158 −158

a Accumulative number of fruits per tree harvested during seasons 2015–2018 (Figure 2d). Different letters indicate statistically significant difference according to Tukey–Kramer HSD test (p ≤ 0.05). b Percentage of tree loss (Figure 2a) + percentage of biotic stress symptoms (Figure 2b). c Productivity value minus the susceptibility index.