Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 20;9(4):530. doi: 10.3390/plants9040530

Table 2.

Pearson correlation among the plant growth, physiological and biochemical parameters, and Cd concentration in soil and plant tissues.

Variables PH SDW RDW GW Pro Fat Fib Ash G-Fe G-Zn Cd-So Cd-Sh Cd-R Cd-G Ci An ET SPAD
PH 1
SDW 0.987 1
RDW 0.989 0.97 1
GW 0.958 0.973 0.941 1
Pro 0.975 0.988 0.968 0.982 1
Fat 0.988 0.994 0.983 0.977 0.989 1
Fib 0.949 0.965 0.924 0.919 0.939 0.953 1
Ash 0.933 0.948 0.92 0.897 0.906 0.942 0.979 1
G-Fe 0.93 0.959 0.926 0.989 0.971 0.966 0.9 0.896 1
G-Zn 0.946 0.959 0.929 0.888 0.914 0.944 0.976 0.989 0.879 1
Cd-So −0.909 −0.941 −0.898 −0.961 −0.927 −0.94 −0.876 −0.904 −0.978 −0.891 1
Cd-Sh −0.83 −0.841 −0.818 −0.782 −0.766 −0.838 −0.866 −0.946 −0.796 −0.928 0.865 1
Cd-R −0.781 −0.807 −0.77 −0.725 −0.725 −0.788 −0.839 −0.923 −0.75 −0.92 0.831 0.98 1
Cd-G −0.812 −0.83 −0.802 −0.739 −0.749 −0.809 −0.857 −0.932 −0.755 −0.939 0.83 0.974 0.996 1
Ci 0.849 0.87 0.837 0.749 0.809 0.835 0.899 0.919 0.749 0.957 −0.777 −0.87 −0.915 −0.941 1
An 0.966 0.979 0.948 0.952 0.971 0.978 0.988 0.957 0.932 0.952 −0.89 −0.825 −0.78 −0.799 0.849 1
ET 0.955 0.955 0.944 0.917 0.935 0.951 0.989 0.977 0.9 0.968 −0.873 −0.865 −0.834 −0.856 0.89 0.976 1
SPAD 0.818 0.84 0.791 0.781 0.793 0.828 0.95 0.95 0.771 0.922 −0.759 −0.872 −0.854 −0.857 0.863 0.905 0.939 1

Values in bold shows significant correlation (p = 0.05) among corresponding plant growth, physiological and biochemical parameters, and pea tissues Cd contents under Cd-contaminated soil conditions. PH: plant height; SDW: shoot dry weight; RDW: root dry weight; GW: grains weight; Pro: protein; Fat: fat; Fib: fiber; Ash: ash; G-Fe: Fe concentration in grains; G-Zn: Zn concentration in grains; Cd-So: Cd concentration in soil; Cd-Sh: Cd concentration in shoot; Cd-R: Cd concentration in roots; Cd-G: Cd concentration in grains; Ci: internal carbon dioxide concentration; An: net assimilation rate; ET: evapotranspiration rate; and SPAD: chlorophyll (SPAD) contents.