Skip to main content
. 2020 May 20;9(5):giaa048. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giaa048

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

Comparison of Smash++ and Smash. (a) Performance on a synthetic dataset. Using the combination of an FCM and an STMM (in Smash++) produces more accurate results than using a single FCM (in Smash). (b) Performance on a real dataset, including S. cerevisiae chr. VII and S. paradoxus chr. VII. The rearrangement maps clearly show the improvement made over Smash, using an FCM along with an STMM.