Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cell Physiol. 2020 Jan 10;235(6):5318–5327. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29419

Table 1:

Differentially expressed of tsRNA following RUNX1 inhibition in MCF10A cells

Comparison p < 0.05 ≥ 2-fold ≥ 2-fold
p < 0.05
≥ 1.5-fold ≥ 1.5-fold
p < 0.05
Up Down Up Down Up Down Up Down
shNS (Control) -> shRUNX1-C1 43 3 3 3 3 17 12 15 10
shNS (Control) -> shRUNX1-C4 24 2 5 1 3 15 13 8 7
shNS -> both shRUNX1-C1 & -C4 21 2 2 1 2 9 8 5 6
 
Identity of tsRNA differentially expressed in both shRUNX1-C1 and shRUNX1-C4 as compared to shNS control ts-107 ts-52 ts-46 ts-19 ts-46 ts-19 ts-41 ts-100 ts-43 ts-14
ts-14 ts-54 ts-65 ts-29 ts-29 ts-43 ts-104 ts-46 ts-19
ts-17 ts-55 ts-46 ts-14 ts-54 ts-29
ts-18 ts-56 ts-54 ts-19 ts-56 ts-48
ts-19 ts-58 ts-56 ts-29 ts-58 ts-55
ts-29 ts-62 ts-58 ts-48 ts-99
ts-34 ts-72 ts-65 ts-55
ts-4 ts-76 ts-7 ts-66
ts-43 ts-8 ts-99
ts-46 ts-99
ts-48

Note: Comparison is fold change and one-way ANOVA between non-silencing (shNS) control and RUNX1 inhibition with two different shRNA (-C1, -C4) in MCF10A normal-like mammary epithelial cells.