R
0, basic reproduction number |
Central 95% range is 1.4–3.9 Gamma distributed,
|
Li et al.10
|
λ
0, rate of arrival of infected travellers (individuals per week) at time when interventions are introduced |
0.1, 1, or 10 or 100 |
Assumption |
θ, probability that infected traveller is not detected by screening |
Exit screening only: 46% (95% CI: 37%, 57%) Entry and exit screening: 42% (95% CI: 33%, 53%) No screening: 100% (100%, 100%) |
Quilty et al.6
|
ρ, effectiveness of traveller sensitisation |
0%, 25%, Sensitivity analyses: 50% |
Gostic et al., Hellewell et al.5,8
|
, epidemic growth rate (per day) |
Central 95% range is 0.05–0.16 Gamma distributed,
|
Li et al.10
|
, probability of outbreak caused by a single infected traveller (without and with intervention, respectively) |
Solution to Equation 1 with for and for
|
Hartfield and Alizon16
|
, number of infected arrivals required to trigger an outbreak in absence of interventions |
quantile of a geometric distribution with probability
|
Derived |
, number of infected arrivals required to trigger an outbreak in presence of interventions |
quantile (matched to above) of a geometric distribution with probability
|
Derived |
, arrival time for the infected traveller who triggers an outbreak, without and with interventions |
Poisson process with intensity
|
Derived |
k, dispersion parameter for number of secondary infections |
0.54 Sensitivity analyses: 0.1 and 2.00 (influenza-like) |
Riou and Althaus, Lloyd-Smith et al., Endo et al.20,22,23
|