Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 17;19(3):175–182. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elz042

Table 2.

Overview of the application of genomic editing technologies in CAR-T cells

Target of CAR Delivery of CAR Target locus Gene-editing method Delivery Editing efficiency Reference
CD19 SB electroporation TRAC and TRBC ZFNs mRNA electrotransfer 15–37% [33]
CD19 Lentivirus TRAC and CD52 TALEN mRNA electrotransfer 10–60% [36]
CD19 AAV vector TRAC (insert CAR to TRAC) CRISPR/Cas9 Electroporation ~70% [29]
CD19 SB electroporation HLA-A ZFNs Nucleofection 40.70% [40]
CD19 Lentivirus B2M and TRAC CRISPR/Cas9 RNA electroporation 52.55–65.21% [26]
CD19 TRAC, B2M and PD-1 37.05–60.97%
CD19 Lentivirus B2M and TRAC CRISPR/Cas9 (incorporating multiple gRNA cassettes in a single CAR vector) Lentiviral vector 71.3 ± 6.7% [42]
TRAC, B2M and Fas 55.10%
TRAC, B2M and PD-1,CTLA-4 40.10%
CD19 Lentivirus TCR and B2M CRISPR/Cas9 RNA electroporation 79.90% [43]
TRBC, B2M and PD-1 /
PSMA Lentivirus dnTGF-βRII / Lentiviral vector 53.20% [55]
CD19 Retrovirus IL-15 and an suicide gene Inducible caspase-9 Retroviral vector 65% [57]
CD19 Retrovirus Safety switch Inducible caspase-9 Retroviral vector 61% ± 5% [58]
CD19 Lentivirus GM-CSF CRISPR/Cas9 Lentiviral vector 82.20% [61]
CD33 Lentivirus CD33 in HSCs CRISPR/Cas9 Electroporation 40–90% [31, 64, 65]
CD7 Gammaretrovirus CD7 in CAR T cells CRISPR/Cas9 Electroporation >80% [66]