Skip to main content
. 2020 May 20;34(1):102–111. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-00986-4

Table 2.

Descriptive clinical outcomes and final response data

All (n = 79)a ICH (n = 38) Ischemic (n = 25) SAH (n = 16)
ICU length of stay, days 14 (7, 18) 15 (11, 18) 8 (6, 14) 20 (14, 24)
Hospital length of stay, days 19 (13, 27) 21 (16, 26) 14 (10, 19) 24 (17, 32)
ICU mortality, no. (%) 5 (6%) 1 (3%) 3 (12%) 1 (6%)
Discharge disposition, no. (%)
 Acute rehabilitation 50 (63%) 24 (63%) 17 (64%) 9 (56%)
 Home 11 (14%) 2 (8%) 5 (24%) 4 (25%)
 Death 9 (11%) 4 (10%) 3 (12%) 2 (12%)
 SNF 8 (10%) 8 (21%) 0 0
 Hospiceb 1 (1%) 0 0 1 (6%)
Amantadine monotherapy responders, no. (%) 34/62 (55%) 16/30 (53%) 11/18 (61%) 7/14 (50%)
Modafinil monotherapy responders, no. (%) 0/15 (0%) 0/8 (0%) 0/6(0%) 0/1 (0%)
Amantadine + modafinil responders, no. (%) 8/24 (33%) 4/15 (27%) 3/5 (60%) 1/4 (25%)

Continuous variables are reported as median (IQR) and frequencies as number (%). Responder denominators sum to more than 79 patients because patients were included in multiple groups if they transitioned to different medications

ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; ICU, intensive care unit; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; SNF, skilled nursing facility

aFrom the 87 enrolled subjects, 8 were excluded from effectiveness analysis, including 5 who died and 3 who were transferred to rehabilitation or skilled nursing facilities

bThis single patient was discharged to hospice, expired 48 h after transfer, and was counted as a death in Fig. 1