Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 20.
Published in final edited form as: Psychooncology. 2016 Jun 20;26(10):1632–1639. doi: 10.1002/pon.4181

Table 3.

Factors predictive of negative effects of cancer treatment on sexual function/intimate relations at 2 years post-diagnosis (n = 449*)

Adjusted OR** 95% CI
Age at diagnosis, years
 15–24 Ref
2539 2.526 1.4434.419
Sex
 Male Ref
 Female 1.208 0.761–1.917
Race
 Hispanic Ref
 Non-white, non-Hispanic 0.619 0.303–1.261
 White 1.263 0.726–2.196
Committed relationship
 No Ref
 Yes 1.643 0.969–2.788
Education
 High school or less Ref
 Some college 1.480 0.832–2.634
 College graduate 1.241 0.668–2.309
Raising children
 Raising children < 18 years Ref
Not raising children <18 years 1.806 1.0583.083
Treatment intensity
 Less intense treatment Ref
 Moderately intensive 1.004 0.479–2.103
 Intense treatment 0.686 0.300–1.581
Ongoing cancer treatment
 No/unknown Ref
 Yes 0.489 0.238–1.004
Time since diagnosis (months) 0.987 0.936–1.041
Mental health component summary (MCS) scorea 0.985 0.961–1.010
PEDsQL Fatigue scorea 0.987 0.9750.998
Physical appearance
 No negative impact Ref
Negative impact 3.077 1.9684.810

Model summary X2 96.812 p < 0.0005, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.260; 70.2% classified. The variables bolded are those that are significant.

*

Difference in sample size due to missing item responses for 16 participants.

**

Odds ratios are adjusted for all other variables in the table.

a

MCS and PEDsQL are treated as continuous variables in the model.