Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Emotion. 2019 Nov 21;21(2):227–246. doi: 10.1037/emo0000699

Table 5.

Study 2 fixed effects for age x high arousal vs. low arousal on modality self-reports

Fixed Effects b β S.E. t 95% CIs
High arousal (HA) interoceptive model
 Intercept 2.02 .00 .16 12.64*** 1.70, 2.33
 Age −.13 −.08 .16 −.83 −.44, .18
 Age2 .04 .09 .04 .89 −.04, .12
 Behavior .15 .04 .16 .93 −.16, .46
 HA Interoception −.01 −.01 .18 −.06 −.37, .34
 Age x Behavior −.01 −.01 .03 −.43 −.08, .05
 Age x HA Interoception −.14 −.07 .04 −3.64*** −.21, −.06
 Age2 x Behavior −.01 −.02 .01 −1.39 −.03, .01
 Age2 x HA Interoception .01 .02 .01 1.40 −.01, .03

Low arousal (LA) interoceptive model
 Intercept 2.01 .00 .18 11.02*** 1.65, 2.36
 Age −.11 −.07 .15 −.74 −.41, .18
 Age2 .03 .07 .04 .79 −.05, .11
 Behavior .15 .04 .20 .72 −.25, .55
 LA Interoception .51 .11 .26 1.94 −.01, 1.03
 Age x Behavior −.01 −.01 .04 −.39 −.08, .06
 Age x LA Interoception .02 .01 .05 .35 −.07, .10
 Age2 x Behavior −.01 −.02 .01 −1.33 −.03, .01
Age2 x LA Interoception .02 .02 .01 1.32 −.01, .04

Note. Standard errors are for the unstandardized betas. Situational modality ratings serve as the reference category.

p< .10,

***

p < .001.