Skip to main content
. 2020 May 13;47(5):3973–3985. doi: 10.1007/s11033-020-05490-8

Table 3.

Comparison of Cupriavidus species Minimum Inhibitory Concentration values

MIC (mM)−1
Metal ionic form Compoundb C. gilardii CR3 C. metallidurans CH34 C. campinensis S14E4C C. campinensis S14E4C
Cd2+ CdCl2*5H2O 4 4
CdSO4*8H2O 19.5 2
Hg2+ HgCl2  > 0.04 0.0027 5.5 1.84
Pb2+ Pb(NO3)2 4 1 9 2.4
As3+ As2O3 4 2 1
Used media Tris-buffered mineral salt medium Tris-salt mineral medium Nutrient medium Tris-salt mineral medium

aMIC values of C. gilardii CR3 and C. metallidurans CH34 are from reference [28, 30, 50], C. campinensis is from this study

bC. gilardii CR3 and C. metallidurans CH34 cadmium resistance was checked by CdCl2*5H2O, whereas in C. campinensis S14E4C by CdSO4*8H2O salt