Skip to main content
. 2020 May 20;11:2526. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14624-2

Table 2.

Predicted effects between variable pairs in the BNM across lakes.

BNM variable pair Number of lakes
Predictor Response Positive effects Negative effcts Mixed effects
Air temperature Water temperature 31 0 0
Water level 6 17 8
Precipitation Water level 29 0 2
Chlorophyll a 9 7 15
Agricultural land use Water level 8 12 11
Chlorophyll a 16 8 7
Water temperature Chlorophyll a 6 15 10
Fish catch 10 10 11
Water level Chlorophyll a 13 8 10
Fish catch 9 5 17
Chlorophyll a Fish catch 12 11 8
Fish stocking Fish catch 4 1 3
Fishing effort Fish catch 30 0 1

Effects between a variable pair were positive, negative, and mixed based on one-tailed 75% credible intervals of BNM coefficients, for which complete summary statistics are given in Supplementary Data 4. Effects of stocking on fish catch were only included in eight lakes where stocked species contributed >20% of fish catches in >10 years in the study period 1970–2014.

BNM Bayesian networks model.