Table 2.
Predicted effects between variable pairs in the BNM across lakes.
BNM variable pair | Number of lakes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Predictor | Response | Positive effects | Negative effcts | Mixed effects |
Air temperature | Water temperature | 31 | 0 | 0 |
Water level | 6 | 17 | 8 | |
Precipitation | Water level | 29 | 0 | 2 |
Chlorophyll a | 9 | 7 | 15 | |
Agricultural land use | Water level | 8 | 12 | 11 |
Chlorophyll a | 16 | 8 | 7 | |
Water temperature | Chlorophyll a | 6 | 15 | 10 |
Fish catch | 10 | 10 | 11 | |
Water level | Chlorophyll a | 13 | 8 | 10 |
Fish catch | 9 | 5 | 17 | |
Chlorophyll a | Fish catch | 12 | 11 | 8 |
Fish stocking | Fish catch | 4 | 1 | 3 |
Fishing effort | Fish catch | 30 | 0 | 1 |
Effects between a variable pair were positive, negative, and mixed based on one-tailed 75% credible intervals of BNM coefficients, for which complete summary statistics are given in Supplementary Data 4. Effects of stocking on fish catch were only included in eight lakes where stocked species contributed >20% of fish catches in >10 years in the study period 1970–2014.
BNM Bayesian networks model.