Skip to main content
. 2020 May 14;11:480. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00480

TABLE 1.

Correlation coefficients, p values, and 95% confidence intervals for intra-individual relationships between session rating of perceived exertion, and Edwards and Banister TRIMPs.

Sex Sessions Edwards TRIMP
Banister TRIMP
r p 95% CI r p 95% CI
P1 F 13 0.88 <0.001 0.64–0.96 0.88 <0.001 0.64–0.96
P2 F 20 0.88 <0.001 0.72–0.95 0.88 <0.001 0.72–0.95
P3 F 11 0.84 <0.001 0.48–0.96 0.81 <0.001 0.41–0.95
P4 F 9 0.68 0.045 0.03–0.93 0.56 0.113 -0.17–0.89
P5 M 21 0.85 <0.001 0.66–0.94 0.83 <0.001 0.62–0.93
P6 M 20 0.70 <0.001 0.37–0.87 0.73 <0.001 0.42–0.89
P7 M 12 0.57 0.051 -0.01–0.86 0.46 0.132 -0.15–0.82
P8 M 16 0.87 <0.001 0.66–0.95 0.80 <0.001 0.50–0.93
P8 M 20 0.83 <0.001 0.61–0.93 0.83 <0.001 0.61–0.93
P10 M 20 0.96 <0.001 0.90–0.98 0.95 <0.001 0.88–0.98
P11 M 22 0.86 <0.001 0.69–0.94 0.87 <0.001 0.71–0.94
Mean (± SD) 16.73 ± 4.5 0.81 ± 0.11 0.78 ± 0.14
Range 9–22 0.57–0.96 0.46–0.95

Raw data for each participant can be seen in Figure 2. TRIMP, Training Impulse; P, Participant; F, Female; M, Male; and CI, Confidence Interval.