Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 7;18:1534735418822056. doi: 10.1177/1534735418822056

Table 3.

Self-reported Use of Vitamin D Supplements in the Subgroup Completing Additional Questions About Use.a

Baseline
6 Months
1 Year
NO Care, Percentage (n) Usual Care, Percentage (n) NO Care, Percentage (n) Usual Care, Percentage (n) NO Care, Percentage (n) Usual Care, Percentage (n)
Total number of patients (71) (194) (90) (221) (82) (244)
Patients reporting any current use of vitamin D (including multivitamins) 85.9 (61) 73.2 (142) 97.8 (88) 81.9 (181) 98.8 (81) 80.3 (196)
 Of those reporting current use: use of vitamin D with calcium combos 29.5 (18) 42.3 (60) 44.3 (39) 55.2 (100) 49.4 (40) 55.1 (108)
 Of those reporting current use: vitamin D as a single supplement 86.9 (53) 72.5 (103) 85.2 (75) 63.5 (115) 82.7 (67) 63.3 (124)
Patients reporting current use of vitamin D (not in multivitamins) 83.1 (59) 68.0 (132) 96.7 (87) 75.1 (166) 96.3 (79) 74.6 (182)
Of those reporting combo or single supplement vitamin D use, self-reported dose
 <1000 IU 69.5 (41) 61.4 (81) 56.3 (49) 50.0 (83) 53.2 (42) 53.3 (97)
 1000-2000 IU 18.6 (11) 32.6 (43) 27.6 (24) 38.5 (64) 29.1 (23) 33.0 (60)
 >2000 IU 11.9 (7) 5.3 (7) 16.1 (14) 10.2 (17) 16.4 (13) 13.2 (24)
 Dose not reported 0.0 (0) 0.8 (1) 0.0 (0) 1.2 (2) 1.3 (1) 0.5 (1)

Abbreviation: NO, naturopathic oncology.

a

Data are for patients who were given a version of the questionnaire that asked about use and dosages of vitamin D, both standalone and in combination with calcium.