Skip to main content
. 2020 May 21;4:7. doi: 10.1186/s41512-020-0071-8

Table 3.

Prognostic factors for training improvement in verbal short-term memory

Study Test for outcome assessment Dependent variable Prognostic factor
Multiple regression
Age Education Sex Neuropsychology Imaging Others
de Lange et al., [32] Word list Standardized residuals White matter microstructure →
McDougall et al. [40]

HVLT

RBMT

Relative gains Pre-test score ↑ Ethnicity →
Neely and Bäckman [42] Immediate recall of word list Post-test scores

MMSE ↑

Pre-test score ↑ *

Rosi et al. [44] Immediate recall of word list Post-test scores

Pre-test ↑*

Working memory ↓

Fluid ability ↓

Crystallized ability ↑*

Processing speed ↑

Short-term memory ↓

Sandberg et al. [45] Number recall Post-test scores ↓*

Episodic memory ↑*

Processing speed ↓

Working memory ↑*

Verbal knowledge ↑

Brooks et al. [8] Name recall Post-test scores ↑* Pre-test score* Pretraining x mnemonic training →
Correlation analysis
Mohs et al. [21] HVLT Post-test scores Subjective reported memory →
Kirchhoff, Anderson, Smith, Barch et al., [22] Recognition memory decisions Change score Activity in frontal cortex ↑
Kirchhoff, Anderson, Smith et al., [22] Recognition memory decisions Change score Activity in hippocampus ↑
Andrewes et al. [26] Face-name test Change score

NART →

RAVT →

Warrington Forced Choice Recognition ↑

Depression →

Mattis dementia scale →

Bråthen et al. [29] Immediate recall of word list n.a.

Hippocampal volume ↑*

Amplitude of low frequency fluctuation ↓

Fractional amplitude of low frequency fluctuation ↓*

Finkel and Yesavage [35] Immediate recall of word list Gain scores x x MMSE x

Openness of experience ↑*

Depression x

Extraversion x

Neuroticism x

Hill et al. [37] Face-name recall Standardized residual scores Rated confidence ↑
Hill et al. [38] Face-name recall Performance changes MMSE ↑
Group comparisons (ANOVA, t test)
Clark, Xu, Callahan et al., [30]

HVLT

RAVL

RBMT

Relative mean improvement Obesity ↓*
Clark, Xu, Unverzagtet al., [31]

HVLT

RAVL

RBMT

Relative mean improvement
McDougall et al. [40]

HVLT

RBMT

n.a. Ethnicity (Blacks and Hispanics scored lower than Whites)
Mixed models
Tomaszewski Farias et al. [34]

HVLT

RAVL

RBMT

Normalized residuals Activities of daily living ↑
López-Higes et al. [39]

Word list recall

Logical memory test

n.a. Apolipoprotein E4 →
No clear reporting
Bissig and Lustig [28] Rank-test n.a. Crystallized intelligence ↑
de Lange et al., [33] Word list Standardized residuals White matter microstructure ↑

Studies are sorted according to the statistical method used for obtaining the prognostic factors

HVLT Hopkins Verbal learning Task, MMSE Mini Mental State Examination, NART National Adult Reading Test, RAVL Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, RBMT Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test, ↑ the higher the prognostic factor, the higher the improvement/positive correlation, ↓ the lower the prognostic factor, the higher the improvement/negative correlation, → no direction of effect reported, * significant, x unclear reporting