Table 3.
Prognostic factors for training improvement in verbal short-term memory
| Study | Test for outcome assessment | Dependent variable | Prognostic factor | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multiple regression | ||||||||
| Age | Education | Sex | Neuropsychology | Imaging | Others | |||
| de Lange et al., [32] | Word list | Standardized residuals | White matter microstructure → | |||||
| McDougall et al. [40] |
HVLT RBMT |
Relative gains | ↑ | Pre-test score ↑ | Ethnicity → | |||
| Neely and Bäckman [42] | Immediate recall of word list | Post-test scores | ↓ | ↑ |
MMSE ↑ Pre-test score ↑ * |
|||
| Rosi et al. [44] | Immediate recall of word list | Post-test scores | ↓ |
Pre-test ↑* Working memory ↓ Fluid ability ↓ Crystallized ability ↑* Processing speed ↑ Short-term memory ↓ |
||||
| Sandberg et al. [45] | Number recall | Post-test scores | ↓* |
Episodic memory ↑* Processing speed ↓ Working memory ↑* Verbal knowledge ↑ |
||||
| Brooks et al. [8] | Name recall | Post-test scores | ↑* | Pre-test score* | Pretraining x mnemonic training → | |||
| Correlation analysis | ||||||||
| Mohs et al. [21] | HVLT | Post-test scores | → | → | → | Subjective reported memory → | ||
| Kirchhoff, Anderson, Smith, Barch et al., [22] | Recognition memory decisions | Change score | Activity in frontal cortex ↑ | |||||
| Kirchhoff, Anderson, Smith et al., [22] | Recognition memory decisions | Change score | Activity in hippocampus ↑ | |||||
| Andrewes et al. [26] | Face-name test | Change score |
NART → RAVT → Warrington Forced Choice Recognition ↑ |
Depression → Mattis dementia scale → |
||||
| Bråthen et al. [29] | Immediate recall of word list | n.a. |
Hippocampal volume ↑* Amplitude of low frequency fluctuation ↓ Fractional amplitude of low frequency fluctuation ↓* |
|||||
| Finkel and Yesavage [35] | Immediate recall of word list | Gain scores | x | x | MMSE x |
Openness of experience ↑* Depression x Extraversion x Neuroticism x |
||
| Hill et al. [37] | Face-name recall | Standardized residual scores | Rated confidence ↑ | |||||
| Hill et al. [38] | Face-name recall | Performance changes | MMSE ↑ | |||||
| Group comparisons (ANOVA, t test) | ||||||||
| Clark, Xu, Callahan et al., [30] |
HVLT RAVL RBMT |
Relative mean improvement | Obesity ↓* | |||||
| Clark, Xu, Unverzagtet al., [31] |
HVLT RAVL RBMT |
Relative mean improvement | → | |||||
| McDougall et al. [40] |
HVLT RBMT |
n.a. | ↓ | Ethnicity (Blacks and Hispanics scored lower than Whites) | ||||
| Mixed models | ||||||||
| Tomaszewski Farias et al. [34] |
HVLT RAVL RBMT |
Normalized residuals | Activities of daily living ↑ | |||||
| López-Higes et al. [39] |
Word list recall Logical memory test |
n.a. | Apolipoprotein E4 → | |||||
| No clear reporting | ||||||||
| Bissig and Lustig [28] | Rank-test | n.a. | ↓ | Crystallized intelligence ↑ | ||||
| de Lange et al., [33] | Word list | Standardized residuals | White matter microstructure ↑ | |||||
Studies are sorted according to the statistical method used for obtaining the prognostic factors
HVLT Hopkins Verbal learning Task, MMSE Mini Mental State Examination, NART National Adult Reading Test, RAVL Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, RBMT Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test, ↑ the higher the prognostic factor, the higher the improvement/positive correlation, ↓ the lower the prognostic factor, the higher the improvement/negative correlation, → no direction of effect reported, * significant, x unclear reporting