Table 1.
Factors influencing the value of any potential treatment.
| Factor | Public health perspective | Manufacturer perspective |
|---|---|---|
| Drug characteristics | ||
| Treatment effectiveness | A therapeutic with significant health benefits, in reduced morbidity and mortality, will have greater value for consumers and for the countries purchasing them. | Manufacturers will be able to charge more for a product with significant health benefits. |
| Speed to market | The speed at which a treatment becomes available is essential, because the costs of illness can increase rapidly as the infectious disease spreads. | Manufacturers will also want to deliver their product quickly to become the standard of care and to make it more difficult for competitors to take market share. |
| Economies of scale | Countries will want to benefit from economies of scale, especially those countries with a large population and/or a high prevalence of COVID-19. Similarly, if there was pooled purchasing at a global or intercountry level, countries could negotiate a lower price. | Initially rapid scale-up can be costly, resulting in lower margins. Nevertheless, as production expands, the cost of producing the treatment should decline. |
| Drug route | There may be less demand for a drug that requires injection rather than oral administration, if there are health system capacity constraints. | Manufacturers will prefer a product that could be administered to the largest number of people possible. |
| Epidemiology | ||
| Severity | Medications that are used to treat more severe illnesses would have greater value than a medication that addresses more mild illnesses. | Manufacturers who treat diseases that are more severe are likely to be able to charge more for the medication. |
| Infectivity | A more infectious or more pathogenic organism makes it more important to have widespread, rapid access to treatment. A treatment that also reduces infectivity will also have a higher value to society. |
A manufacturer is likely to be able to charge higher unit costs for a therapeutic agent that provides preventive as well as therapeutic characteristics. |
| Scale of demand | Larger-scale demand will pose more challenges of affordability. As the number of people needing treatment increases, the overall price tag becomes higher. | Manufacturers are likely to be willing to negotiate lower prices as countries commit to larger and longer-term purchases, including the purchase of stockpiles of the drug. |
| Likelihood of multiyear outbreaks | Countries may wish to negotiate lower prices and possibly longer contracts if they are planning to purchase stockpiles of medications for future use. | Manufacturers may have less need to recoup their investment costs immediately if the demand is going to continue in the future, especially if herd immunity effects are limited. |
| Potential for a vaccine or alternative treatments | Countries may not be willing to pay higher unit prices for treatment in the short run if a vaccine or alternative is imminent or already available. | Manufacturers may try to increase short-term prices if they do not expect long-term demand for their products. |
| Economic parameters | ||
| Market share | As countries can choose from alternative treatment approaches, they will have greater ability to negotiate lower prices. | Manufacturers will be limited in their ability to charge higher prices if multiple products are approved at the same time. |
| Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of treatment | The greater the cost-effectiveness of any treatment (including benefits from reductions in both morbidity and mortality), the more a country may value that treatment. | A manufacturer with a highly cost-effective product will be able to charge more for that product. On the other hand, products with smaller benefits will not be priced as highly. |
| Health financing system | Larger countries and those with strictly regulated or centralized purchasing mechanisms would have greater negotiating power to reduce the price of any therapeutic. | Manufacturers may target their sales, at least initially, to countries where purchases tend to be less regulated and ability and willingness to pay is higher (eg, United States). |
| Economic status of countries | Lower-income countries are likely to have less ability to pay for a treatment, particularly if it also requires other significant healthcare costs. Thus, lower-income countries will require discounted prices of products. | Manufacturers can benefit from differential pricing, charging higher prices in high-income countries and lower prices in low-income countries. |
| Social and political imperatives | ||
| Disease burden | As total mortality and morbidity rise in a country, the ability of the country to pay per course of treatment would decline, since the number of people needing the treatment would represent a significant commitment by the government. | Suppliers will face political pressure to deliver as quickly and affordably as possible, particularly as potential patients go untreated. Increased volume may compensate for reduced margins per dose or course. |
| Public relations/advocacy | Countries may encourage advocacy to laud suppliers who are viewed as prioritizing the public good while shaming suppliers who are viewed as taking advantage of a global crisis. | A manufacturer may view the launch of a new drug as perilous given the potential positive or negative perception of that company. Any perception of price gouging could significantly damage their reputation. |
COVID-19 indicates coronavirus disease 2019.