Table 8.
HA-based biomaterials in bone regeneration
No. | Composite | Method of preparation | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | HA-Chitosan | In situ chemical synthesis, freeze drying, co-precipitation | Pore forming ability, good binding capacity, anti-bacterial and biodegradable | Mechanical properties need to be improved [122–134] |
2 | HA-Collagen | Supercritical fluid assisted process, cryogelation technique |
Better cell attachment, proliferation and differentiation ability | Presence of charged and polar groups which critically affect the nucleation of the HA crystals on collagen membrane through chemical interaction [136–153] |
3 | HA-Polycaprolactone (HA/PLC) |
Modified rapid-prototyping for nHA/PLC, pressure quench nHA/PLC | Good biodegradation, mechanical strength, growth of MSCs and guide their osteogenic differentiation. | Difficulty in new bone tissue binding [2,152–167] |
4 | HA-Polyvinyl alcohol | Freeze/thaw, spray drying | Good hydrophilicity, excellent chemical stability, useful for bone tissue engineering and articular cartilage repair. | Need further in vitro and in vivo studies [8,9,168–177] |
5 | HA-Poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid | Selective laser sintering, Electrospinning | Good compressive strength and modulus of elasticity | Smaller pore size [178–182] |