Table 3.
Univariable and multivariable analysis of key factors associated with completing 3HP treatment in Iqaluit (n = 73)
| Factor | Completed n/73 (%) | Univariate analysis odds ratio (95% CI) |
Multivariate analysis odds ratio (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (10 year increment) | 60(82.2%) | 0.96(0.91,1) | 0.99(0.94,1.04) |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 35(87.5%) | 2.24(0.66,7.66) | 1.16(0.26,5.15) |
| Female | 25(75.8%) | Reference | |
| Ethnicity | |||
| Inuit | 40(80.0%) | 0.6(0.15,2.43) | 1.13(0.18,7.05) |
| Non-Inuit | 20(87.0%) | Reference | |
| Employment | |||
| Yes | 33(82.5%) | 1.05(0.32,3.49) | 1.50(0.30,7.65) |
| No | 27(81.8%) | Reference | |
| Alcohol Use(cage score) | |||
| No alcohol use | 32(88.9%) | 13.33(2.27,78.20) | 9.45(0.91,98.0) |
| Cage score <2 | 25(86.2%) | 10.42(1.76,61.67) | 6.93(0.76,62.76) |
| cage score ≥2* | 3(37.5%) | Reference | |
| Cannabis use | |||
| No | 46(82.1%) | 0.99(0.24,4.09) | 0.35(0.05,2.64) |
| Yes | 14(82.4%) | Reference | |
| Smoking | |||
| No | 31(91.2%) | 3.56(0.89,14.25) | 2.66(0.50,14.16) |
| Yes | 29(74.4%) | Reference | |
| Treatment reason | |||
| Contact screening | 27(93.1%) | Reference | |
| Employer screening | 16(76.2%) | 0.27(0.05,1.42) | 0.5(0.07,3.43) |
| School screening | 3(100%) | 0.64(0.02,24.87) | 0.55(0.01,33.01) |
| Walk in to clinic | 14(70.0%) | 0.20(0.04,1.03) | 0.22(0.04,1.31) |
| Concomitant medications | |||
| No | 34(94.4%) | 7.19(1.47,35.30) | 4.68(0.94,23.28) |
| Yes | 26(70.3%) | Reference |
*A total score of 2 or greater is considered clinically significant for substance abuse disorder. [28]
Ethnicity (Inuit versus non-Inuit), employment (paid employment, yes or no), alcohol (no alcohol, Cage score <2 versus ≥2), cannabis (no versus yes), smoking (no versus yes), treatment reason (contact, walk in, school screen, employer screen), concomitant medications (no versus yes).