Skip to main content
. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0232414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232414

Table 5. Comparison of the N-SRS, and the R-FSRS performance on the Validation population using the c-statistic.

Detailed results are shown for the main ethnicity groups.

BMC–White BMC–Black BMC–Hispanic
Model AUC 95% CI AUC 95% CI AUC 95% CI
N-SRS 74.30% 0.7149–0.771 75.80% 0.7345–0.767 72.79% 0.6889–0.7671
R-FSRS (both genders) 64.91% 0.6266–0.6716 64.85% 0.6304–0.6666 61.04% 0.5601–0.6587
R-FSRS (women) 67.35% 0.6411–0.7058 65.22% 0.628–0.6764 61.06% 0.5548–0.6663
R-FSRS (men) 62.46% 0.5931–0.6555 64.49% 0.6181–0.6717 61.01% 0.5621–0.6587
Log.Reg 71.55% 0.6823–0.7402 69.77% 0.6823–0.7402 70.46% 0.6765–0.7359
CART 69.01% 0.6627–0.7134 66.41% 0.6272–0.6609 66.10% 0.6286–0.6934
Random Forest 75.08% 0.7162–0.7855 73.14% 0.7139–0.749 70.80% 0.6807–0.7354
XGBoost 77.32% 0.7582–0.7881 74.88% 0.7133–0.7842 74.27% 0.7187–0.7667