Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 2;33(6):505–513. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpaa031

Table 3.

Right common carotid artery mechanical properties and aortic stiffness in the 4 groups of subjects

Parameters NTN HTN MetS CKD
Number of subjects 15 16 15 16
Right common carotid artery
 Systolic BP (mm Hg) 102 ± 14 122 ± 16** 133 ± 18** 121 ± 16**
 Diastolic BP (mm Hg) 69 ± 8 77 ± 9* 78 ± 8* 76 ± 8*
 Mean BP (mm Hg) 83 ± 10 96 ± 11** 99 ± 10** 94 ± 9*
 Pulse pressure (mm Hg) 33 ± 9 45 ± 12* 55 ± 17** 45 ± 14**
 Internal diameter (mm) 5.36 ± 0.59 5.55 ± 0.75 5.86 ± 1.29 5.94 ± 0.78
 IMT (µm) 876 ± 132 861 ± 149 831 ± 142 928 ± 121
 Wall/lumen 0.17 ± 0.03 0.16 ± 0.04 0.15 ±0.04 0.16 ± 0.03
 WCSA (mm2) 17.2 ± 3.5 17.3 ± 3.2 17.6 ± 4.9 20.1 ± 4.5
 Circumferential wall stress (kPa) 33.9 ± 4.8 41.7 ± 11.9 46.8 ± 16.3* 40.4 ± 9.6
 Young elastic modulus (kPa) 217 ± 477 477 ± 347** 1,009 ± 832** 448 ± 260**
 Distensibility (kPa−1 × 10−3) 37.1 ± 13.0 19.4 ± 7.5* 13.3 ± 8.7** 20.2 ± 8.8*
 Stiffness (m/s) 5.5 ± 1.1 7.7 ± 1.9** 10.6 ± 4.4** ,† 7.6 ± 2.0** ,‡
Aortic stiffness
 Carotid femoral PWV (m/s) 7.8 ± 1.3 9.4 ± 1.3* 10.4 ± 2.7* 9.7 ± 2.2*

Large vessel study was performed in normotensive subjects (NTN), and patients with hypertension (HTN) associated or not with other features of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) or with chronic kidney disease (CKD) at visit 2. Data are shown as means ± SD. Comparisons between multiple groups were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Student–Newman–Keuls post hoc test or in absence of normal distribution, a Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA followed by a Dunn’s multiple comparison test, as appropriate. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.001 vs. NTN, P < 0.05 vs. HTN, P < 0.05 vs. MetS. Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; IMT, intima media thickness; PWV, pulse wave velocity; WCSA, wall cross-sectional area.