Skip to main content
. 2020 May 31;18(2):219–230. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2020.18.2.219

Table 1.

The effect of physiological saline or prazosin treatment on noradrenalline, GABA, glycine, glutamate levels and acetylcholine esterase activity in different brain regions of rats subjected to stress

NTs (ng/mg tissue) Brain regions Stress (−) Stress (+) Two-way ANOVA statistics (source of variation)


Physiological saline Prazosin Physiological saline Prazosin
NA AC 3.07 ± 0.24 3.70 ± 0.30 3.88 ± 0.22** 3.68 ± 0.40 Stress (df = 1, f = 6.652, p < 0.05)
Interaction (df = 1, f = 7.986, p < 0.05)
DH 2.83 ± 0.13 2.88 ± 0.3 3.31 ± 0.19 2.80 ± 0.50 Stress (df = 1, f = 1.058, p > 0.05)
Treatment (df = 1, f = 1.401, p > 0.05)
PFC 2.63 ± 0.4 3.1 ± 0.2 2.79 ± 0.60 2.85 ± 0.50 Stress (df = 1, f = 0.02554, p > 0.05)
Treatment (df = 1, f = 1.265, p > 0.05)
RP 7.39 ± 0.23 3.77 ± 0.4 18.89 ± 3.36* 3.50 ± 0.20 Interaction (df = 1, f = 6.697, p < 0.05)
GABA AC 3.07 ± 0.24 3.70 ± 0.22 3.89 ± 0.23* 3.68 ± 0.18 Interaction (df = 1, f = 4.447, p < 0.05)
DH 122.90 ± 2.83 119.60 ± 17.10 126.30 ± 7.61 112.60 ± 13.60 Stress (df = 1, f = 1.472, p > 0.05)
Treatment (df = 1, f = 0.5429, p > 0.05)
PFC 103.10 ± 10.60 124.70 ± 8.10 110.50 ± 11.60 113.60 ± 4.80 Treatment (df = 1, f = 8.300, p < 0.01)
Interaction (df = 1, f = 4.681, p < 0.05)
RP 136.20 ± 6.58 157.40 ± 10.10 129.30 ± 11.10 135.10 ± 12.60 Stress (df = 1, f = 4.258, p > 0.05)
Treatment (df = 1, f = 3.683, p > 0.05)
Gly AC 4.03 ± 0.44 4.60 ± 1.20 4.64 ± 0.57 4.30 ± 0.90 Stress (df = 1, f = 0.0953, p > 0.05)
Treatment (df = 1, f = 0.0569, p >0.05)
DH 5.08 ± 0.84 3.90 ± 1.30 4.67 ± 0.61 4.60 ± 0.60 Stress (df = 1, f = 0.0802, p > 0.05)
Treatment (df = 1, f = 0.9751, p > 0.05)
PFC 4.53 ± 1.00 4.15 ± 1.10 3.99 ± 0.70 4.44 ± 0.40 Stress (df = 1, f = 0.0992, p > 0.05)
Treatment (df = 1, f = 0.0058, p > 0.05)
RP 4.26 ± 0.50 3.30 ± 0.40 4.22 ± 0.38 4.00 ± 0.80 Stress (df = 1, f = 0.6570, p > 0.05)
Treatment (df = 1, f = 2.176, p > 0.05)
Glu AC 32.22 ± 2.79 36.00 ± 4.80 31.81 ± 2.28 38.60 ± 8.50 Stress (df = 1, f = 0.1402, p > 0.05)
Treatment (df = 1, f = 3.263, p > 0.05)
DH 31.30 ± 2.57 40.20 ± 10.10 32.91 ± 3.05 33.40 ± 6.20 Stress (df = 1, f = 0.4574, p > 0.05)
Treatment (df = 1, f = 0.1865, p > 0.05)
PFC 35.07 ± 8.40 45.25 ± 7.90 35.08 ± 7.20 36.48 ± 8.50 Stress (df = 1, f = 0.1309, p > 0.05)
Treatment (df = 1, f = 2.291, p >0.05)
RP 31.45 ± 1.99 37.00 ± 4.60 36.14 ± 2.29 40.80 ± 12.10 Stress (df = 1, f = 0.2541, p > 0.05)
Treatment (df = 1, f = 0.1633, p > 0.05)
AChE A AC 2.76 ± 0.31 185.70 ± 62.00 31.49 ± 8.36 145.10 ± 62.00 Treatment (df = 1, f = 9.948, p < 0.05)
DH 29.76 ± 19.07 255.00 ± 50.00* 3.87 ± 1.00 174.00 ± 50.00 Stress (df = 1, f = 3.693, p > 0.05)
Treatment (df = 1, f = 44.84, p > 0.05)
Interaction (df = 1, f = 3.066, p > 0.05)
PFC 107.50 ± 16.10 847.80 ± 69.10 548.6 ± 98.80 648.03 ± 76.80 Treatment (df = 1, f = 6.803, p < 0.05)
RP 1.53 ± 0.22 39.10 ± 10.00 92.23 ± 23.75 175.00 ± 74.00* Stress (df = 1, f = 9.134, p > 0.05)
Treatment (df = 1, f = 2.578, p > 0.05)
Interaction (df = 1, f = 0.3628, p > 0.05)

Values are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean.

GABA, gamma aminobutyric acid; NTs, neurotransmitters; NA, noradrenalline; Gly, glycine; Glu, glutamate; AChE A, acetylcholine esterase activity; AC, amygdaloid complex; DH, dorsal hippocampus; PFC, prefrontal cortex; RP, rostral pons.

*

p < 0.05, Bonferroni post-test, significantly different from others. **p < 0.01, Bonferroni post-test, significantly different from others.