Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Apr 25;49(6):1162–1178. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01237-7

Table 2.

Correlations among main study variables

	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15
1. Positive RT	—
2. Negative RT	.31^**	—
3. Sensation Seeking	.25^**	.39^**	—
4. Impulse Control	.08	−.14^*	−.07	—
5. BART RT	.06	.14	.15^*	−.12	—
6. Stoplight RT	.19^*	.21^**	.11	.03	.14	—
7. Reward Sensitivity^a	.03	.08	.14^*	.09	.19^**	.13	—
8. Punish. Sensitivity^a	−.15^*	−.01	.06	−.12	.21^**	−.02	.15^*	—
9. Grit	−.04	−.14^*	−.01	.45^**	−.04	−.06	.04	−.04	—
10. School Engagement	.26^*	−.18^**	−.05	.17^*	.05	.08	.03	−.02	.2^**	—
11. Internalizing Symt.	.03	.02	.01	−.1	−.1	−.08	−.14^*	−.06	−.22^**	−.06	—
12. Age	.004	.05	−.003	−.01	−.03	.12	.2^**	−.06	−.03	.05	.001	—
13. Parent Education	.21^**	.21^**	.05	.05	−.01	.14	.14^*	−.18^**	−.08	.01	−.06	.1	—
14. Intellectual Fxn.	.29^**	.22^**	.19^**	.11	.03	.13	.03	−.13	.02	.16^*	.004	−.13	.09	—
15. Gender	−.16^*	.06	.06	−.01	.26^**	.11	.07	.19^**	.08	−.11	−.2^**	−.16^*	.003	.1	—

Note. RT = risk taking; Gender: females coded as 0 and males coded as 1. Internalizing symptoms reflects average of mother and father reports.

^a

Linear slope factor score

^*

p < .05;

^**

p < .01