Skip to main content
. 2020 May 22;45(4):675–683. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00845-5

Table 2.

Respondents’ health status and characteristics of working environment

N (%)
Received influenza vaccine in the season 2019–20 128 (33.0)
Health problems requiring chronic drug therapy 63 (16.2)
Presence of at least one typical symptom (fever, dry cough, myalgia) in the past 14 days 95 (24.5)
COVID-19 positive cases that respondents have come in close contact with
 Patients within the working centre 370 (95.4)
 Patients within the working unit 219 (56.4)
 Colleagues within the working unit

186 (47.9)

101 (26.0)

 Family members or friends
Involvement in the extraordinary management of COVID-19 patients with tasks beyond respondent’s own specialty 87 (22.4)
Indications for COVID-19 screening at the workplace
 No screening is planned for healthcare workers 122 (31.4)
 Screening occurs if symptomatic or close contact with COVID-19 cases 217 (55.9)
 All healthcare workers are screened 49 (12.6)
Respondents tested for COVID-19 98 (25.3)
 More than once 39 (39.8)
  Due to symptoms 6 (15.4)
  Due to local screening policy in absence of symptoms 28 (71.8)
  Due to a new close contact at risk 5 (12.8)
Symptomatic at the time of first testing 33 (33.7)
Testing positive for COVID-19 18 (4.6)
   At first testing 13 (72.2)
   At second testing 1 (5.6)
   At third testing 4 (22.2)
 Infection did likely occur while working
   Yes 16 (88.9)
   No 1 (5.6)
   Uncertain 1 (5.6)
 Regular use of personal protective equipment
   No 6 (33.3)
   Yes, everyone entering the workplace 9 (50.0)
   Yes, but only the respondent 3 (16.7)
 Use of medical therapy 11 (61.1)
   Specific therapy for COVID-19 6 (54.5)
   NSAIDs 2 (18.2)
   Both 5 (45.4)
 Required hospital admission 1 (5.6)
 Required O2-therapy 1 (5.6)
Quarantined 42 (10.8)
Readily availability of personal protective equipment 298 (76.8)
 Quantity and quality rating
   Adequate 64 (21.5)
   Partially adequate 73 (24.5)
   Inadequate 161 (54.0)
Number of intensive care unit beds before the outbreak
    < 5 20 (5.1)
   5–10 70 (18.0)
   11–15 98 (25.3)
    > 15 123 (31.7)
I do not know 77 (19.9)
Number of intensive care unit beds during COVID-19 emergency at the workplace
 Increased 317 (81.7)
   With increase in dedicated staffing 133 (42.0)
   Without increase in dedicated staffing 80 (25.2)
 Remained unaltered 31 (8.0)
Activation of local protocols for management of COVID-19 patients 336 (86.6)
  Personally contributed to its development 66 (19.6)
  Comply with its requirements 204 (60.7)
Deaths related to COVID-19 occurred at the workplace 247 (63.7)
 Management was correct, with cause of death most likely resulting from respiratory failure
   Yes 114 (46.1)
   No 33 (13.4)
  I do not know 100 (40.5)
 Number of deaths likely resulting from suboptimal bed capacity
   More than 50% 11 (4.4)
   Less than 50% but still significant 34 (13.8)
   Very few 47 (19.0)
   None 155 (62.8)
 Number of deaths likely resulting from non-compliance to protocols
   More than 50% 21 (8.9)
   Less than 50% but still significant 26 (10.5)
   Very few 96 (38.8)
   None 104 (42.1)
10-point Likert scale rating (1 = extremely poor; 10 = excellent) of the local management of COVID-19 emergency, mean (standard deviation) 5.7 (1.8)
Perceive psychological safety
   Over the last few weeks 77 (19.8)
   Currently 97 (25.0)
Believe to have been the source of infection
   For patients 29 (7)
   For work colleagues 35 (9)
For family members 33 (9)
At least one work colleague died from COVID-19 27 (7.0)
At least one family member or friend died from COVID-19 46 (11.9)
Believe that psychological support for healthcare workers is useful during COVID-19 emergency 247 (63.7)
Psychological support available at the workplace 187 (48.2)
Currently receiving psychological support 13 (3.3)
Workload over last few weeks
   Decreased 162 (41.8)
   Unaltered 56 (14.4)
   Slightly increased 58 (15.0)
   Moderately increased 61 (15.7)
   Extremely increased 32 (8.2)
   Increased to the extreme of own strengths 19 (4.9)