Skip to main content
. 2020 May;10(5):1058–1079. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-564

Table 3. Summary of two-arm meta analyses of chest imaging findings between COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 patients.

Feature No. of studies Cochran’s Q statistic for homogeneity Significance Pooled odds ratio Lower 95% confidence limit Upper 95% confidence limit
Air bronchogram 2 8.8982 ** 1.7278 0.1380 21.6247
Bilateral lung involvement 3 16.7833 *** 5.2572 0.8808 31.3799
Central involvement 2 2.3047 ns 0.1067 0.0106 1.0705
Consolidation 3 2.1513 ns 0.7589 0.4792 1.2018
Crazy paving pattern 2 1.6045 ns 1.5246 0.2592 8.9672
Ground glass opacity 4 5.7531 ns 7.0664 3.0037 16.6242
Lymphadenopathy 3 1.2547 ns 0.3185 0.1453 0.6982
Ground glass opacity + consolidation 2 0.7161 ns 1.2531 0.8573 1.8321
Pleural effusion 3 13.6684 ** 0.2911 0.0223 3.8004
Peripheral involvement 2 3.2278 ns 8.0191 0.6149 104.5740
Unilateral lung involvement 2 13.3551 *** 0.5207 0.0230 11.7804

Degrees of freedom for Q statistic = number of studies less 1; ns, not significant, i.e., P>0.05. **, highly significant, i.e. P < 0.01; ***, very highly significant, i.e., P<0.001.