Skip to main content
. 2020 May 21;10:8470. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64911-7

Table 2.

Characteristic indicators of the dual balancing task.

Subject STD θs (deg) Freq-peak θs (Hz) STD xs (cm) Corrcoef xsvs.θs Corrcoef xsvs.θcom
1 2.86 0.35 13.69 −0.67 0.74
2 1.32 0.39 11.83 −0.25 0.18
3 2.65 0.41 11.43 −0.75 0.76
4 1.93 0.39 13.85 −0.65 0.90
5 2.53 0.41 12.12 −0.66 0.91
6 1.00 0.43 9.46 −0.30 0.92
7 1.54 0.37 6.49 −0.11 0.90
8 1.59 0.35 8.86 −0.67 0.87
9 1.86 0.39 10.71 −0.61 0.81
10 0.81 0.34 8.46 −0.38 0.23
11 1.65 0.31 14.37 −0.54 0.95
12 1.51 0.34 8.31 −0.71 0.76
13 0.84 0.56 7.89 −0.44 0.93
14 1.44 0.51 8.89 −0.56 0.87
Median 1.57 0.39 10.09 −0.58 0.87
Model 1.52 0.41 15.03 −0.61 0.76

STD: Standard Deviation; θs: tilt angle of the stick from the vertical; xs: back and forth motion of the CIP-like device; Freq-peak: frequency peak of the FFT of θs; Corrcoef: Correlation Coefficient; Model refers to the average value. for each parameter. of model simulations; Median refers to the measurements from the whole population of subjects.