Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 10;2(3):104–110. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.02.001

Table 2.

Angiographic findings and intervention in the whole cohort and comparison of both groups

Variables Whole cohort (n = 308) Group LVT (+) n = 36 (11.7%) Group LVT (−) n = 272 (88.3%) P value
No. of significantly diseased coronary arteries
 Single-vessel disease, n (%) 107 (35) 15 (42) 92 (34) NS
 Multivessel disease, n (%) 201 (65) 21 (58) 180 (66) NS
 2 coronary arteries, n (%) 86 (28) 9 (25) 77 (28) NS
 3 coronary arteries, n (%) 115 (37) 12 (33) 103 (38) NS
IRA
 LM, n (%) 1 (0.3) 0 1 (0.4)
 LAD, n (%) 169 (55) 34 (94) 135 (50) < 0.0001
 LCX, n (%) 34 (11) 1 (3) 33 (12) < 0.0001
 RCA, n (%) 104 (34) 1 (3) 103 (38) < 0.0001
Procedure in 107 patients with single-vessel disease
 PPCI to LM, n (%) 1 (1) 0 1
 PPCI to LAD, n (%) 76 (71) 15 (100) 62 (67) 0.009
 PPCI to RCA, n (%) 21 (19.6) 0 21 (100) 0.03
 PPCI to LCX, n (%) 9 (8.4) 0 9 (100) NS
Procedure in 201 patients with multivessel disease:
 Culprit lesion-only PPCI, n (%) 167 (83) 20 (95) 147 (82) NS
 Complete revascularization, n (%) 34 (17) 1 (5) 33 (18) NS

IRA, infarct-related artery; LAD, left anterior descending; LCX, left circumflex; LM, left main; NS, not significant; PPCI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention; RCA, right coronary artery.

Complete revascularization at the time of PPCI.