Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 31;2(3):79–84. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2019.12.006

Table 2.

Comparison of baseline characteristics by improvement category at 1 year

Improvement in 2 frailty metrics (n = 9) Improvement in 1 frailty metrics (n = 8) No improvement in frailty metrics (n = 34) P value
Age 87.0 ± 5.8 89.8 ± 4.7 84.5 ± 5.9 0.055
CAD 7 (77.8%) 7 (87.5%) 15 (44.1%) 0.024
Previous CABG 5 (55.6%) 5 (62.5%) 7 (20.6%) 0.028
Diabetes 2 (22.2%) 1 (12.5%) 6 (17.6%) 0.872
Atrial fibrillation 3 (33.3%) 1 (12.5%) 11 (32.4%) 0.499
Previous valvular surgery 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 3 (8.8%) 0.440
Baseline overall well-being (%) 87.0 ± 5.2 89.8 ± 4.7 84.5 ± 5.9 0.169
Baseline Katz ADL index 5.6 ± 1.0 6.0 ± 0.0 5.9 ± 0.4 0.155
Baseline total MLHFQ score 34.0 ± 14.8 32.4 ± 13.6 23.8 ± 15.3 0.196
Baseline grip (kg) 19.7 ± 9.6 24.6 ± 7.3 24.8 ± 7.9 0.251
10MWT (s) 7.9 ± 2.5 7.8 ± 2.5 6.0 ± 1.3 0.009

Higher ADL score is interpreted as higher function, and higher MLHFQ scores are interpreted as higher burden.

10MWT, 10-m walk test; ADL, activities of daily living; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CAD, coronary artery Disease; MLHFQ, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire.