Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 24;2(3):118–128. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.02.005

Table 1.

Characteristics of observational studies comparing T2MI with T1MI

Study first author (year of publication) Design Countries Enrollment periods No. of patients with MI No. of centres/countries Key inclusion criteria Key exclusion criteria
Arora (2018) Retrospective United States 2013-2014 1039 Single centre All patients with NSTEMI STEMI, transferred in, no available troponins, cardiac arrest
Baron (2014) Prospective (SWEDEHEART Study) Sweden 2011 18,891 73 Swedish hospitals MI hospitalized in Sweden None
Cediel (2016) Retrospective Spain 2012-2013 570 Single university centre All adults with at least 1 value of troponin tested Cardiac arrest, alternate diagnoses other than MI, lived far
Chapman (2018) Prospective Scotland 2009-2009 1600 1 tertiary centre All patients with elevated troponin values Admitted for elective procedures, incomplete electronic hospital records, and nonresidents
Gonzalez (2011) Retrospective United States 2004-2007 348 1 tertiary centre All MI with ≥ 50% coronary stenosis on angiogram and ≥ 24-mo follow-up Terminal diseases, refused standard MI treatment, no obstructive coronary artery disease
Greenslade (2017) Pooled study of 1 prospective observational and 1 interventional study Australia 2008-2014 152 Single tertiary centre Adults with MI who could provide consent, enrollment during regular working hours Pregnant, lived far
Javed (2009) Prospective United States 2009 207 Single centre All adults with ≥ 1 abnormal troponin value who provided consent Refusal to participate
Lambrecht (2018) Prospective study Denmark 2010 479 Single centre All patients with at least 1 troponin ≥ 99th percentile normal value Pregnant, lived outside catchment area
Lopez-Cuenca (2016) Retrospective Spain 2012-2013 824 Single veterans tertiary centre All patients with MI None
Nestelberger (2017) Retrospective Switzerland, Italy, Germany, Spain, Poland 2006-2015 924 12 centres/5 countries Adults within 12 h of ischemic symptoms Unclear diagnosis
Neumann (2017) Prospective Germany 2013-2016 287 Single university centre Adults with suspected MI who could provide consent Missing troponins,
STEMI
Radovanovic (2016) Prospective (AMIS-PLUS) Switzerland 2009-2015 14,920 53 Swiss hospitals All patients hospitalized with MI in Switzerland None
Raphael (2020) Prospective United States 2003-2012 2, 436 Mayo Clinic and Olmstead Medical Center Adults with ≥ 1 available troponin value Prior MI, refused to consent, unclear cause for elevation of troponin
Saaby (2014) Prospective Denmark 2010 488 Single centre Adults with ≥ 1 available troponin value Outside catchment area, troponins administered outside the hospital
Sandoval (2015) Retrospective United States 2013 310 Single centre Adults with ≥ 1 available troponin value None
Sandoval (2017) Prospective (UTROPIA Study) United States 2011 217 Single centre All patients who provided consent and with ≥ 2 troponins and 1 ECG within 24 h Pregnant,transferred in patients, did not present to the emergency department
Shah (2015) Prospective Scotland 2014 1600 Single centre All patients with troponin I ≥ 50 ng/L None
Smilowitz (2018) Prospective United States 2012-2013 283 Single veterans tertiary centre All patients with elevated troponin values None
Stein (2014) Prospective national Israel registry (ACSIS Registry) Israel 2008-2010 2818 Nationwide Israel multicentres (26 intensive and 37 medical wards) All patients with MI None

ACSIS, Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey; AMIS-PLUS, National Registry of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland; ECG, electrocardiogram; MI, myocardial infarction; NSTEMI, non–ST-segment myocardial infarction; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; SWEDEHEART, Swedish Web-System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies; T1MI, type 1 myocardial infarction; T2MI, type 2 myocardial infarction; UTROPIA, Use of Troponin in Acute Coronary Syndromes.