Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 24;2(3):118–128. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.02.005

Table 3.

Management and outcomes of patients

RCT
Observational studies
No. of studies (No. of patients) Weighted mean, % (95% CI) P values
RCT vs observational studies
No. of studies comparing T1MI and T2MI (No. of patients) T1MI weighted mean, % (95% CI) T2MI observational studies
% weighted mean, (95% CI)
P values T1MI vs T2MI ORs of T2MI compared with T1MI (95% CI)
In-hospital initiation of DAPT NA NA NA 6 (19,480) 74.2 (66.0-81.0) 20.8 (4.1-34.2) < 0.0001 0.09 (0.04-0.21)
Coronary angiography 35 (83,466) 99.8 (99.7-99.9) < 0.0001 8 (35,795) 82.9 (77.8-87.0) 28.2 (18.5-40.4) < 0.0001 0.28 (0.20-0.39)
PCI 34 (78,358) 99.8 (99.6-99.9) < 0.0001 9 (36,825) 64.4 (52.8-74.6) 10.3 (4.3-22.6) < 0.0001 0.17 (9.1-32.7)
Reinfarction 4 (5,321) 3.3 (2.6-4.2) < 0.0001 5 (5396) 9.8 (6.3-14.9) 6.4 (4.0-10.1) 0.002 0.62 (0.47-0.84)
Short-term mortality 12 (97,269) 2.9 (1.7-4.9) < 0.0001 8 (7249) 7.1 (5.5-8.8) 15.6 (10.3-20.8) 0.0006 1.86 (1.20-2.88)
Long-term mortality 4 (33,593) 3.6 (2.3-5.4) < 0.0001 16 (46,947) 11.3 (6.4-19.2) 27.7 (20.6-36.1) < 0.0001 2.47 (2.06-2.96)
11 (42,912)
1.45 (1.25-1.69)

CI, confidence interval; DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; NA, nonapplicable (due to randomized comparison of dual antiplatelet therapy vs placebo); PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; RCT, randomized controlled trials; T1MI, type 1 myocardial infarction; T2MI, type 2 myocardial infarction.

Unadjusted comparison.

Adjusted comparison.