Skip to main content
. 2020 May 15;11:812. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00812

TABLE 1.

Goodness-of-fit statistics for the estimated measurement and predictive models.

Description χ2 (df) CFI TLI RMSEA 90% CI AIC CAIC BIC ABIC
Study 1: Sample 1
M0. One-factor model 627.445 (27)* 0.774 0.698 0.194 [0.181; 0.207] 16,629 16,775 16,748 16,662
M1. Two-factor CFA 102.625 (26)* 0.971 0.960 0.071 [0.057; 0.085] 15,867 16,018 15,990 15,901
M2. Bifactor CFA 54.180 (18)* 0.986 0.973 0.058 [0.041; 0.076] 15,807 16,001 15,965 15,851
M3. M1 with outcomes 1,493.153 (637)* 0.929 0.921 0.048 [0.045; 0.051] 61,311 62,075 61,933 61,482
M4. M2 with outcomes 1,456.746 (623)* 0.930 0.921 0.048 [0.044; 0.051] 61,267 62,107 61,951 61,456
Study 1: Sample 2
M0. One-factor model 329.230 (27)* 0.798 0.730 0.171 [0.154; 0.187] 9,288 9,422 9,395 9,309
M1. Two-factor CFA 82.595 (26)* 0.962 0.948 0.075 [0.057; 0.094] 8,923 9,062 9,034 8,945
M2. Bifactor CFA 39.379 (18)* 0.986 0.971 0.056 [0.032; 0.079] 8,871 9,050 9,014 8,899
M3. M1 with outcomes 801.100 (436)* 0.935 0.926 0.047 [0.042; 0.052] 34,947 35,561 35,437 35,043
M4. M2 with outcomes 745.480 (422)* 0.942 0.932 0.045 [0.039; 0.050] 34,902 35,585 35,447 35,009
Study 2
M0. One-factor model 1,266.738 (27)* 0.735 0.647 0.208 [0.199; 0.218] 28,133 28,294 28,267 28,181
M1. Two-factor CFA 212.089 (26)* 0.960 0.945 0.082 [0.072; 0.093] 26,270 26,437 26,409 26,320
M2. Bifactor CFA 132.070 (18)* 0.976 0.951 0.077 [0.065; 0.090] 26,116 26,331 26,295 26,181
M3. M1 with covariates 917.084 (242)* 0.959 0.953 0.051 [0.048; 0.055] 72,705 73,194 73,112 72,851
M4. M2 with covariates 770.468 (231)* 0.967 0.960 0.047 [0.043; 0.051] 72,512 73,067 72,974 72,678

CFA, confirmatory factor analyses; χ2, scaled χ2 test of exact fit; df, degrees of freedom; CFI, comparative fit index; TLI, Tucker-Lewis index; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; 90% CI, 90% confidence interval. *p < 0.05.