TABLE 3.
Means and standard deviations of the variables.
Variable | Condition | |||||
Coaching intervention | Training intervention | No intervention | ||||
M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | |
T0 | ||||||
Motivation | 3.35 | 1.11 | 2.91 | 0.82 | 3.18 | 1.13 |
IP scores | 2.25 | 0.57 | 2.27 | 0.55 | 2.23 | 0.58 |
Goal attainmenta | 4.49 | 1.82 | 4.27 | 1.74 | 5.23 | 1.83 |
T01 | ||||||
Goal attainmenta | 4.89 | 1.53 | 4.06 | 1.44 | 5.57 | 2.00 |
T1 | ||||||
Satisfaction | 3.72 | 0.46 | 3.69 | 0.41 | – | – |
Utilityb | 66.94 | 15.78 | 64.85 | 12.90 | – | – |
Content-related knowledgec | 5.67 | 2.44 | 7.00 | 2.83 | 5.00 | 2.70 |
Career management | 3.64 | 0.47 | 3.22 | 0.66 | 3.18 | 0.69 |
IP scores | 1.95 | 0.28 | 2.11 | 0.33 | 2.36 | 0.54 |
Goal attainmenta | 6.60 | 2.08 | 5.45 | 1.68 | 5.77 | 2.16 |
Mediating variables | ||||||
Self-enhancing attributions | 6.90 | 0.95 | 6.43 | 1.19 | 5.98 | 0.96 |
Self-destructive attributions | 5.11 | 1.20 | 5.29 | 0.71 | 5.34 | 1.31 |
Self-efficacy | 4.39 | 0.68 | 3.74 | 0.69 | 3.41 | 0.68 |
Tendency to cover up errors | 1.87 | 0.61 | 2.19 | 0.60 | 2.24 | 0.56 |
Fear of negative evaluation | 2.04 | 0.68 | 2.24 | 0.88 | 2.54 | 0.96 |
T2 | ||||||
IP scores | 1.79 | 0.30 | 2.12 | 0.48 | 2.22 | 0.52 |
Goal attainmenta | 6.66 | 2.36 | 5.58 | 1.52 | 5.87 | 1.93 |
Career management | 3.49 | 0.61 | 3.25 | 0.48 | 3.15 | 0.57 |
Tendency to cover up errors | 1.74 | 0.56 | 2.27 | 0.49 | 2.28 | 0.36 |
Fear of negative evaluation | 1.98 | 0.63 | 2.23 | 0.67 | 2.59 | 0.66 |
N = 103. aN = 98. Four participants were excluded from the analysis because they did not set a goal; one was excluded because of a missing value. bScores ranged from 0 to 100. cScores ranged from 0 to 12.