Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 8;7:100051. doi: 10.1016/j.wroa.2020.100051

Table 3.

Comparison of monitoring results with quality requirements for toilet flushing from 18 selected wastewater reuse specifications (details in Table S5). The type of requirement (max/min concentration, max/min average, or min removal) is specified in brackets. The column “quality requirements met” describes the percentage of requirements that were met (compared to the number of specifications that give requirements for the parameter) and is categorized into all (100%), mostly (90%), partially (50%), mostly not (<50%) or none (0%) of the specifications were met.

Parameter Range of requirements Quality requirements met
P1
Hand Washing Station
Zurich
P2
Hand Washing Station
Durban
P3
Toilet System
Durban
Chemical composition
COD (mgO2/L) 50-100 (max), 50 (max avg) n/a all all
TOCa (mgC/L) 5 (max), 3 (max avg) all n/a n/a
Total nitrogen (mgN/L) 1.6–7.8 (max), 70% (min removal) all all partially
Ammonium (mgN/L) 6 (max), 4 (max avg) all all mostly not
Total phosphorus (mgP/L)b 0.2 (max), 80% (min removal) partially partially partially
pH (−) 6–9.5 all all all
Hygiene
Residual chlorine (mg/L) 0.2–5 (min), 0.5 (min avg) none mostly not none
E. coli (#/100 mL) <1–200 (max), <1–20 (max avg) all all all
Total coliforms (#/100 mL) 0.3–240 (max), 2.2–23 (max avg) n/a all allc
Appearance
Color (Pt/Co) 15-30 (max) n/a all all
Turbidity (NTU) 0.5–10 (max), 0.2–5 (max avg) n/a mostly mostly
TSS (mg/L) 5-1500 (max) n/a all all
a

TOC DOC.

b

Measured phosphate.

c

Excluding one sample that was presumably contaminated during sampling or analysis.