Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 23;63(4):1128–1147. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00247

Table 5.

Models predicting executive functioning development: questionnaire measures.

Model BRIEF Inhibit
BRIEF Shift
BRIEF Working Memory
Estimate p Estimate p Estimate p
Model 1
 Hearing group 5.57 (0.47, 10.68) 0.04 4.62 (0.88, 8.36) 0.02 6.46 (1.49, 11.43) 0.02
 Age −0.88 (−2.01, 0.24) 0.12 −0.38 (−1.60, 0.84) 0.54 −0.56 (−1.84, 0.72) 0.39
 Sex −0.76 (−5.65, 4.12) 0.76 3.03 (−0.50, 6.56) 0.10 0.68 (−4.05, 5.41) 0.77
 Income $50–$95K a −0.46 (−6.30, 5.37) 0.87 −3.92 (−8.45, 0.61) 0.09 −1.72 (−7.56, 4.12) 0.56
 Income $95K+ a −3.32 (−8.84, 2.21) 0.23 −7.44 (−11.48, −3.40) 0.001 −3.71 (−9.10, 1.67) 0.17
 Nonverbal ability 0.00 (−0.12, 0.12) 0.97 0.01 (−0.12, 0.13) 0.90 −0.09 (−0.22, 0.05) 0.21
Model 2 b

Note. Hearing group coded as cochlear implant = 1 and normal hearing = 0. Sex coded as male = 0 and female = 1. Estimates are unstandardized regression coefficients. Values in parentheses are 95% confidence interval. Values in bold are p < .05. BRIEF = Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function T-score; Nonverbal ability = Differential Ability Scales–Second Edition, Picture Similarities subtest T-score.

a

Compared to the reference group of $0–$50K.

b

Neither Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Fourth Edition nor Preschool Language Scale–Fourth Edition met entry criteria of p < .05 for entry into the equation predicting any of the three BRIEF measures; therefore, Model 2 is the same as Model 1.